<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publishers Weekly&#8217;s Best of 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 03:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s that time of year &#8212; the round-ups are starting. (Actually, given how early Publishers Weekly started, these guys seem to be running late in comparison. But it&#8217;s not a contest.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] It&#8217;s that time of year &#8212; the round-ups are starting. (Actually, given how early Publishers Weekly started, these guys seem to be running late in comparison. But it&#8217;s not a contest.) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the kind that scares me more! I suspect that this is a case of a great work that simply isn&#039;t to my taste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the kind that scares me more! I suspect that this is a case of a great work that simply isn&#8217;t to my taste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Carter</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2005/12/11/publishers-weeklys-best-of-2005/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>You might want to reconsider your &#039;Not Interested&#039; take on &lt;i&gt;Black Hole&lt;/i&gt;. Yes, it&#039;s horror, but it&#039;s not blood-n-guts horror; but rather creepy, transformation &amp; psychological horror. It goes for unease, rather than shock. Burns&#039; artwork is fantastic, and full of barely disguised Freudian imagery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to reconsider your &#8216;Not Interested&#8217; take on <i>Black Hole</i>. Yes, it&#8217;s horror, but it&#8217;s not blood-n-guts horror; but rather creepy, transformation &amp; psychological horror. It goes for unease, rather than shock. Burns&#8217; artwork is fantastic, and full of barely disguised Freudian imagery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

