<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big-City Comics and a New Blogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Book publishers are a lot more mature/professional than comic publishers are in many ways. I also think it&#039;s a different situation when an already established writer reviews something in their field than when someone who wants to be discovered does so. I personally look askance at someone who&#039;s reviewing comics at the same time they&#039;re trying to break into writing comics. Part of that is due to my championing reviewing as a craft in itself -- too many people see it only as a way to get noticed and gain traction to do what they really want to do. I think that&#039;s bad for the field, and I want a higher level of professionalism than that. I also think that newbies should concentrate on one or the other, at least while they&#039;re getting started and learning the ropes. 

I remember having to explain to a reviewer one time that if he was praising issue #1 of an anthology while he knew that a story of his was going to be in issue #2 of the same anthology, he really needed to tell his readers that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Book publishers are a lot more mature/professional than comic publishers are in many ways. I also think it&#8217;s a different situation when an already established writer reviews something in their field than when someone who wants to be discovered does so. I personally look askance at someone who&#8217;s reviewing comics at the same time they&#8217;re trying to break into writing comics. Part of that is due to my championing reviewing as a craft in itself &#8212; too many people see it only as a way to get noticed and gain traction to do what they really want to do. I think that&#8217;s bad for the field, and I want a higher level of professionalism than that. I also think that newbies should concentrate on one or the other, at least while they&#8217;re getting started and learning the ropes. </p>
<p>I remember having to explain to a reviewer one time that if he was praising issue #1 of an anthology while he knew that a story of his was going to be in issue #2 of the same anthology, he really needed to tell his readers that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Isabella</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Isabella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2006/01/04/big-city-comics-and-a-new-blogger/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>What a load of crap.  Mystery writers review mystery books.  Science fiction and horror writers review science fiction and horror books.  I bet there are even romance writers who review romance novels.  Why should writing comics and reviewing them be considered unethical?

Of course, since I&#039;ve been fighting this battle since you were a toddler *smile* I may be taking these comments a wee bit personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of crap.  Mystery writers review mystery books.  Science fiction and horror writers review science fiction and horror books.  I bet there are even romance writers who review romance novels.  Why should writing comics and reviewing them be considered unethical?</p>
<p>Of course, since I&#8217;ve been fighting this battle since you were a toddler *smile* I may be taking these comments a wee bit personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
