<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No SPX Anthology This Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/01/no-spx-anthology-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/01/no-spx-anthology-this-year/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schee</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/01/no-spx-anthology-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-21177</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 00:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/01/no-spx-anthology-this-year/#comment-21177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a break is a good idea too. I bought last year&#039;s (I think) but put it down unfinished after reading the story about a guy who enjoys urinating on unflushed poop. Because I couldn&#039;t believe it made it past whatever editorial guidelines there were.

It no longer serves the purpose I used to use it for, which was sampling talented new creators work. Since most of the talented creators are too busy doing their own work be it in their own book or online. Which leaves a lot of garbage left over for the book, which just isn&#039;t worth digging through for perhaps that one gem you may find.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a break is a good idea too. I bought last year&#8217;s (I think) but put it down unfinished after reading the story about a guy who enjoys urinating on unflushed poop. Because I couldn&#8217;t believe it made it past whatever editorial guidelines there were.</p>
<p>It no longer serves the purpose I used to use it for, which was sampling talented new creators work. Since most of the talented creators are too busy doing their own work be it in their own book or online. Which leaves a lot of garbage left over for the book, which just isn&#8217;t worth digging through for perhaps that one gem you may find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
