<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little Lulu: Lucky Lulu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/18/little-lulu-lucky-lulu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/18/little-lulu-lucky-lulu/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adult Male-Targeted Manga Doesn&#8217;t Sell? &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/18/little-lulu-lucky-lulu/comment-page-1/#comment-70131</link>
		<dc:creator>Adult Male-Targeted Manga Doesn&#8217;t Sell? &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.comicsworthreading.com/2006/06/18/little-lulu-lucky-lulu/#comment-70131</guid>
		<description>[...] fits in with my impression of the rest of their publications. With the notable exception of Little Lulu, most of their releases seem to me to be firmly aimed at the traditional young adult male comic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] fits in with my impression of the rest of their publications. With the notable exception of Little Lulu, most of their releases seem to me to be firmly aimed at the traditional young adult male comic [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
