<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preview Packs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32369</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32369</guid>
		<description>Don, I agree with you about &quot;tactile&quot;, but that didn&#039;t seem to sway DC from cutting out a lot of previews from retailers. 

It&#039;s a shame that the good guys find themselves on the shoddy end of policies because of those poor retailers out there who can&#039;t separate the business from fandom. 

Lisa, thanks for elaborating on the selection issues. I agree, more variety would better suit everyone&#039;s needs. 

Don, you&#039;re probably right about printing. When I was on Image&#039;s comp list, what I got and when was affected by that as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, I agree with you about &#8220;tactile&#8221;, but that didn&#8217;t seem to sway DC from cutting out a lot of previews from retailers. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the good guys find themselves on the shoddy end of policies because of those poor retailers out there who can&#8217;t separate the business from fandom. </p>
<p>Lisa, thanks for elaborating on the selection issues. I agree, more variety would better suit everyone&#8217;s needs. </p>
<p>Don, you&#8217;re probably right about printing. When I was on Image&#8217;s comp list, what I got and when was affected by that as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32368</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 20:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32368</guid>
		<description>I believe that another factor that affects inclusion in these preview packs is *where* they&#039;re printed.  Publishers don&#039;t print everything through Quebecor, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that another factor that affects inclusion in these preview packs is *where* they&#8217;re printed.  Publishers don&#8217;t print everything through Quebecor, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Lopacinski</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32364</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Lopacinski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32364</guid>
		<description>Both DC and Marvel have had a tendancy to include &quot;slow selling&quot; comics rather than the biggies. For example, we received probably 9 consecutive issues of Spider-Girl.  It is fine to get the lower sellers, to help show them to customers and generate some new interest, but to get the same titles over and over is not productive. It just seems like a way to prop up sales numbers.  Marvel does include a top-tier book every now and again, usually when something big or new is coming, and DC wouldn&#039;t do that as often. Having the Marvel ones sent separate did often result in lateness and or damage to the books. We even had a couple that were torn open and were missing an issue or two.  We have thought about dropping the program, and might once DC stops theirs, but we are the only store in the area who does it, so it&#039;s kind of a novelty thing we do that other&#039;s don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both DC and Marvel have had a tendancy to include &#8220;slow selling&#8221; comics rather than the biggies. For example, we received probably 9 consecutive issues of Spider-Girl.  It is fine to get the lower sellers, to help show them to customers and generate some new interest, but to get the same titles over and over is not productive. It just seems like a way to prop up sales numbers.  Marvel does include a top-tier book every now and again, usually when something big or new is coming, and DC wouldn&#8217;t do that as often. Having the Marvel ones sent separate did often result in lateness and or damage to the books. We even had a couple that were torn open and were missing an issue or two.  We have thought about dropping the program, and might once DC stops theirs, but we are the only store in the area who does it, so it&#8217;s kind of a novelty thing we do that other&#8217;s don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32350</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of the EW writer who was frustrated that Marvel wouldn&#039;t give him preview copies so that he could get reviews to appear in EW the same week the comic hit the shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of the EW writer who was frustrated that Marvel wouldn&#8217;t give him preview copies so that he could get reviews to appear in EW the same week the comic hit the shelves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32346</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32346</guid>
		<description>Well, Marvel already offers some full previews online (through the Diamond website) to retailers and has been for some time.  And those previews run about 3-4 weeks before the release date.

As for security, I know the publishers are a bit concerned about people downloading &quot;pirated&quot; scans of their books, but ultimately, I think readers are tactile by nature.  People will always want to feel the paper in their hands.  Plus so many are collectors at heart as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Marvel already offers some full previews online (through the Diamond website) to retailers and has been for some time.  And those previews run about 3-4 weeks before the release date.</p>
<p>As for security, I know the publishers are a bit concerned about people downloading &#8220;pirated&#8221; scans of their books, but ultimately, I think readers are tactile by nature.  People will always want to feel the paper in their hands.  Plus so many are collectors at heart as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32345</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32345</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much for filling in those blanks, Don! I can imagine that many retailers are finding the program less worthwhile than it used to be. 

Back when, I used the preview pack to prepare reviews that could run when the comics were coming out (instead of days or much later). You know, like other media send out screeners or hold preview showings? 

Interesting that DC&#039;s moving to online. I wonder how secure that will be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for filling in those blanks, Don! I can imagine that many retailers are finding the program less worthwhile than it used to be. </p>
<p>Back when, I used the preview pack to prepare reviews that could run when the comics were coming out (instead of days or much later). You know, like other media send out screeners or hold preview showings? </p>
<p>Interesting that DC&#8217;s moving to online. I wonder how secure that will be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-32328</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 02:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/17/preview-packs/#comment-32328</guid>
		<description>Interesting side note about Marvel&#039;s First Look package: the weekly fee for the services for Canadian retailers recently went from $14.50 US to $34.50 US for what usually turns out to be $20-$25 worth of comics (which are shipped unprotected).

Marvel has claimed Diamond forced the price hike, and vice versa.

It essentially spells the end of such Marvel preview packs in Canada.

DC has announced its Sneak Peek program is coming to an end, to be replaced with full online previews for retailers.

I&#039;m also told that Image has informed retailers that should the value of the books in its preview package be less than the fee ($6 US weekly, I believe, just like DC&#039;s), that week&#039;s package will come at no cost (or be reimbursed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting side note about Marvel&#8217;s First Look package: the weekly fee for the services for Canadian retailers recently went from $14.50 US to $34.50 US for what usually turns out to be $20-$25 worth of comics (which are shipped unprotected).</p>
<p>Marvel has claimed Diamond forced the price hike, and vice versa.</p>
<p>It essentially spells the end of such Marvel preview packs in Canada.</p>
<p>DC has announced its Sneak Peek program is coming to an end, to be replaced with full online previews for retailers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also told that Image has informed retailers that should the value of the books in its preview package be less than the fee ($6 US weekly, I believe, just like DC&#8217;s), that week&#8217;s package will come at no cost (or be reimbursed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
