<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rough Stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:42:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-69398</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 06:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/#comment-69398</guid>
		<description>Ugh, another reason I don&#039;t like inkers. They try too much to be &quot;real artists,&quot; especially when they sometimes don&#039;t even know nearly as much about it as pencilers, when comics as a whole is manufactured art, and they really can&#039;t be, because it screws it up. People remember the penciler&#039;s name if I&#039;m not mistaken, and when they try to be &quot;artists,&quot; all they are doing is messing with the pencilers name. I just wish it was possible to do it fast enough to actually eliminate the need for inkers. Anybody agree?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh, another reason I don&#8217;t like inkers. They try too much to be &#8220;real artists,&#8221; especially when they sometimes don&#8217;t even know nearly as much about it as pencilers, when comics as a whole is manufactured art, and they really can&#8217;t be, because it screws it up. People remember the penciler&#8217;s name if I&#8217;m not mistaken, and when they try to be &#8220;artists,&#8221; all they are doing is messing with the pencilers name. I just wish it was possible to do it fast enough to actually eliminate the need for inkers. Anybody agree?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-34276</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/#comment-34276</guid>
		<description>[...] When I talked aboutfirst issue, I asked for a different variety of artists. With Rough Stuff #2, I got my request. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] When I talked aboutfirst issue, I asked for a different variety of artists. With Rough Stuff #2, I got my request. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-32550</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/#comment-32550</guid>
		<description>Oh, neat, that&#039;s a lineup that I&#039;m more excited by... just because I&#039;m less familiar with seeing their sketch work. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, neat, that&#8217;s a lineup that I&#8217;m more excited by&#8230; just because I&#8217;m less familiar with seeing their sketch work. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie De Blieck Jr.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-32494</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie De Blieck Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/#comment-32494</guid>
		<description>I questioned this when it was first announced and was assured that the contents of the book are completely separate from the MODERN MASTERS books.  No overlap.

The second issue has since been solicited for October and includes work from the likes of Alex Toth, Matt Wagner, Paul Gulacy, Jerry Ordway, and more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I questioned this when it was first announced and was assured that the contents of the book are completely separate from the MODERN MASTERS books.  No overlap.</p>
<p>The second issue has since been solicited for October and includes work from the likes of Alex Toth, Matt Wagner, Paul Gulacy, Jerry Ordway, and more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-32475</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/08/20/rough-stuff/#comment-32475</guid>
		<description>I hereby volunteer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hereby volunteer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
