<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ellison Sues Fantagraphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:50:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellison Fantagraphics Suit Resolved &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-69607</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellison Fantagraphics Suit Resolved &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-69607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is reporting that the Ellison/Fantagraphics suit has been resolved, with no further word available as the parties involved aren&#8217;t discussing [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] is reporting that the Ellison/Fantagraphics suit has been resolved, with no further word available as the parties involved aren&#8217;t discussing [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s You and Him Fight! CBLDF vs Fantagraphics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-44779</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#8217;s You and Him Fight! CBLDF vs Fantagraphics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-44779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has turned down their request for assistance. Fantagraphics has been sued by Harlan Ellison over their book The Comics Journal Library: The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] Comic Book Legal Defense Fund has turned down their request for assistance. Fantagraphics has been sued by Harlan Ellison over their book The Comics Journal Library: The [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-34424</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-34424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Via Journalista, Fantagraphics&#8217; response (.doc file) to Harlan Ellison&#8217;s lawsuit against them. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] Via Journalista, Fantagraphics&#8217; response (.doc file) to Harlan Ellison&#8217;s lawsuit against them. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chary</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33380</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only people who go to jail for not paying money in the US are people who owe child support.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people who go to jail for not paying money in the US are people who owe child support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33376</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 11:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The book page &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fantagraphics.com/wtys/2006_07_16_archive.html#115137517308602257&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;available here&lt;/a&gt; says that Ellison was about to be arrested for &quot;failing to obey a court order&quot;, so yeah, that was the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book page <a href="http://www.fantagraphics.com/wtys/2006_07_16_archive.html#115137517308602257" rel="nofollow">available here</a> says that Ellison was about to be arrested for &#8220;failing to obey a court order&#8221;, so yeah, that was the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Spaulding</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33371</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Spaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Groth appears to be alleging that Ellison was nearly arrested for non-payment of an award of judicial expenses. This sounds awfully unlikely to me. We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago. Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America? I suppose it&#039;s possible, but my alarm bells are ringing.&lt;/i&gt;

I am not a lawyer but if the court orders you to pay something and you refuse to pay, you can be arrested for contempt of court. If you can&#039;t afford to pay, that&#039;s a defense but that wasn&#039;t the issue (according to Groth, obviously).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Groth appears to be alleging that Ellison was nearly arrested for non-payment of an award of judicial expenses. This sounds awfully unlikely to me. We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago. Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America? I suppose it&#8217;s possible, but my alarm bells are ringing.</i></p>
<p>I am not a lawyer but if the court orders you to pay something and you refuse to pay, you can be arrested for contempt of court. If you can&#8217;t afford to pay, that&#8217;s a defense but that wasn&#8217;t the issue (according to Groth, obviously).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33360</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I think that complaint is the best writing I&#039;ve ever seen Ellison do.&quot;

In fairness to Ellison, I&#039;d assume it was written by his lawyer, who&#039;s named on the first page.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think that complaint is the best writing I&#8217;ve ever seen Ellison do.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fairness to Ellison, I&#8217;d assume it was written by his lawyer, who&#8217;s named on the first page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33359</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s my take on the difference between Ellison and Ellis:

Ellis would shout at the gol-durn kids to get off his lawn, chase them off if necessary, then blog about it.

Ellison would not only chase them off, he&#039;d pursue them until he reached the city limits, then file for a restraining order to prevent them from coming within two blocks of his lawn ever again.  He would then periodically bring up the restraining order at conventions for the next 10 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take on the difference between Ellison and Ellis:</p>
<p>Ellis would shout at the gol-durn kids to get off his lawn, chase them off if necessary, then blog about it.</p>
<p>Ellison would not only chase them off, he&#8217;d pursue them until he reached the city limits, then file for a restraining order to prevent them from coming within two blocks of his lawn ever again.  He would then periodically bring up the restraining order at conventions for the next 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote a small article on the lawsuit. Part of the lawsuit involves the charge that Fanta &quot;gratuitously insulted&quot; Ellison by calling him a &quot;Famous Comics Dilettante&quot;. Since when is that an insult?

http://www.whyilovecomics.com/2006/09/19/28/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a small article on the lawsuit. Part of the lawsuit involves the charge that Fanta &#8220;gratuitously insulted&#8221; Ellison by calling him a &#8220;Famous Comics Dilettante&#8221;. Since when is that an insult?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whyilovecomics.com/2006/09/19/28/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whyilovecomics.com/2006/09/19/28/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie De Blieck Jr.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33349</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie De Blieck Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that complaint is the best writing I&#039;ve ever seen Ellison do.  It&#039;s a crazy lawsuit -- from my IANAL POV -- but it&#039;s well worth the time to read it for sheer entertainment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that complaint is the best writing I&#8217;ve ever seen Ellison do.  It&#8217;s a crazy lawsuit &#8212; from my IANAL POV &#8212; but it&#8217;s well worth the time to read it for sheer entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kosmicki</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33347</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kosmicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The missing link could well be that Fantagraphics, for probably the first time in its publishing history, actually has cash -- their Peanuts reprints (and possibly the Dennis the Menace) are a hit.  Fantagraphics has always been a shoestring outfit -- there was no money to get from them.  Now that there at least appears to be money, Ellison is bringing back his defamation claims in a new suit.

add this to the &quot;no, look over here&quot; nature of trying to distract fandom from the Willis incident, plus his notorious hair-trigger temper and grudge-bearing nature, and while it may be simplistic, it&#039;s the explanation that makes the most sense to me.

Having said that, I&#039;d have to go back to my old TCJ copies, but when Ellison grants interviews, etc., there&#039;s usually a claim that the interview is copyright and/or run with permission of Ellison&#039;s corporation. If there is such a claim on that original interview, and Fantagraphics didn&#039;t get his permission to reprint, there&#039;s a legitimate claim here.  Given the history and Ellison&#039;s known litigious nature, I can&#039;t imagine Fantagraphics would make that mistake. But then again, Groth has held on to this grudge just as long and just as viciously.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The missing link could well be that Fantagraphics, for probably the first time in its publishing history, actually has cash &#8212; their Peanuts reprints (and possibly the Dennis the Menace) are a hit.  Fantagraphics has always been a shoestring outfit &#8212; there was no money to get from them.  Now that there at least appears to be money, Ellison is bringing back his defamation claims in a new suit.</p>
<p>add this to the &#8220;no, look over here&#8221; nature of trying to distract fandom from the Willis incident, plus his notorious hair-trigger temper and grudge-bearing nature, and while it may be simplistic, it&#8217;s the explanation that makes the most sense to me.</p>
<p>Having said that, I&#8217;d have to go back to my old TCJ copies, but when Ellison grants interviews, etc., there&#8217;s usually a claim that the interview is copyright and/or run with permission of Ellison&#8217;s corporation. If there is such a claim on that original interview, and Fantagraphics didn&#8217;t get his permission to reprint, there&#8217;s a legitimate claim here.  Given the history and Ellison&#8217;s known litigious nature, I can&#8217;t imagine Fantagraphics would make that mistake. But then again, Groth has held on to this grudge just as long and just as viciously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33340</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago. Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

No, this type of thing really doesn&#039;t happen in America. As someone who is a fan of both Ellison and Fantagraphics, (the work, not the behaviour) I&#039;ve been following this whole Hatfields vs. McCoys thing between them since the beginning. It&#039;s distracting and annoying, yet strangely entertaining, in a Jerry Springer sort of way. There&#039;s a lot of exaggeration and fabrication on both sides of this whole thing.

Here&#039;s what strikes me as odd. It&#039;s probably the wanna be spin doctor in me (ever since Wag The Dog) but, several points about this are bugging me.

1. Ellison just publicly embarassed himself with an incident that got even his staunchest supporters to recognize that he was way out of line. While he has publicly apologized for it, and Ms. Willis has been waaaaay too gracious about it, the damage to his percieved reputation has been done.

2. Ellison knows that his ongoing feud with Groth and Fantagraphics is fairly sensational, even though it&#039;s been pretty much a cold war for a while, everybody just loves to write about it. If he ramps it up a notch by filing a very public lawsuit, he might just distract everybody long enough that they forget the whole Connie Willis incident.

3. Maybe I&#039;m just being paranoid here, but you have to wonder about the timing. After all, Fantagraphics published &quot;The Book on the Edge of Forever&quot; by Christopher Priest, which is far more defamatory towards Ellison&#039;s work ethic and reputation than anything I&#039;ve seen from &quot;Comics As Art&quot;. He never bothered with legal action there.

4. Of course, this tactic didn&#039;t work for President Clinton, but you never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago. Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>No, this type of thing really doesn&#8217;t happen in America. As someone who is a fan of both Ellison and Fantagraphics, (the work, not the behaviour) I&#8217;ve been following this whole Hatfields vs. McCoys thing between them since the beginning. It&#8217;s distracting and annoying, yet strangely entertaining, in a Jerry Springer sort of way. There&#8217;s a lot of exaggeration and fabrication on both sides of this whole thing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what strikes me as odd. It&#8217;s probably the wanna be spin doctor in me (ever since Wag The Dog) but, several points about this are bugging me.</p>
<p>1. Ellison just publicly embarassed himself with an incident that got even his staunchest supporters to recognize that he was way out of line. While he has publicly apologized for it, and Ms. Willis has been waaaaay too gracious about it, the damage to his percieved reputation has been done.</p>
<p>2. Ellison knows that his ongoing feud with Groth and Fantagraphics is fairly sensational, even though it&#8217;s been pretty much a cold war for a while, everybody just loves to write about it. If he ramps it up a notch by filing a very public lawsuit, he might just distract everybody long enough that they forget the whole Connie Willis incident.</p>
<p>3. Maybe I&#8217;m just being paranoid here, but you have to wonder about the timing. After all, Fantagraphics published &#8220;The Book on the Edge of Forever&#8221; by Christopher Priest, which is far more defamatory towards Ellison&#8217;s work ethic and reputation than anything I&#8217;ve seen from &#8220;Comics As Art&#8221;. He never bothered with legal action there.</p>
<p>4. Of course, this tactic didn&#8217;t work for President Clinton, but you never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul O'Brien</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33329</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul O'Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That writ does seem rather over the top even by American standards.  (If I drafted something like that here in Scotland, I&#039;d be laughed out of court.) My personal favourite line: &quot;Recently, however, Groth has gone too far in his obsession and, EVEN THOUGH ELLISON HAS BETTER THINGS TO DO, he elects by this action finally to prosecute Groth&#039;s defamation...&quot;  I&#039;d love to know why somebody thought it was a good idea to include that line.

Having said that, I&#039;m confused by the second passage Ellison complains about.  Groth appears to be alleging that Ellison was nearly arrested for non-payment of an award of judicial expenses.  This sounds awfully unlikely to me.  We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago.  Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America?  I suppose it&#039;s possible, but my alarm bells are ringing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That writ does seem rather over the top even by American standards.  (If I drafted something like that here in Scotland, I&#8217;d be laughed out of court.) My personal favourite line: &#8220;Recently, however, Groth has gone too far in his obsession and, EVEN THOUGH ELLISON HAS BETTER THINGS TO DO, he elects by this action finally to prosecute Groth&#8217;s defamation&#8230;&#8221;  I&#8217;d love to know why somebody thought it was a good idea to include that line.</p>
<p>Having said that, I&#8217;m confused by the second passage Ellison complains about.  Groth appears to be alleging that Ellison was nearly arrested for non-payment of an award of judicial expenses.  This sounds awfully unlikely to me.  We abolished imprisonment for civil debts about a century ago.  Does this sort of thing REALLY still happen in America?  I suppose it&#8217;s possible, but my alarm bells are ringing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33327</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and don&#039;t forget the &#039;.txt&#039; at the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and don&#8217;t forget the &#8216;.txt&#8217; at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coil</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33326</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a link to an &lt;a href=&quot;http://harlanellison.com/foe/bugfuck.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;old article&lt;/a&gt; that tells a lot about the feud between Ellison and Groth. I thought it presented both sides of the situation, and it chides both of them for letting this go on. It is rather lengthy. When I read it, I copied it to Word so I could read it offline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a link to an <a href="http://harlanellison.com/foe/bugfuck.txt" rel="nofollow">old article</a> that tells a lot about the feud between Ellison and Groth. I thought it presented both sides of the situation, and it chides both of them for letting this go on. It is rather lengthy. When I read it, I copied it to Word so I could read it offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He pretty much has to be self-aggrandizing to claim that his wonderful reputation has been besmirched.  Of course, that doesn&#039;t really require defaming the other party in the filing.

I&#039;d say the suit is him trying to bully people into settling, but he&#039;s been so vocal about loving to sue people in the past that it seems a little unlikely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He pretty much has to be self-aggrandizing to claim that his wonderful reputation has been besmirched.  Of course, that doesn&#8217;t really require defaming the other party in the filing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the suit is him trying to bully people into settling, but he&#8217;s been so vocal about loving to sue people in the past that it seems a little unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Macy</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33323</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Macy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all the artist could ever get from the publisher--no matter what the publisher has done with the artist&#039;s work or to the artist&#039;s reputation--is some form of payment, and only after winning a court battle, the artist has quite limited rights.  For better or worse, our legal systems tend to award the artists much more than just the bare right to get paid something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all the artist could ever get from the publisher&#8211;no matter what the publisher has done with the artist&#8217;s work or to the artist&#8217;s reputation&#8211;is some form of payment, and only after winning a court battle, the artist has quite limited rights.  For better or worse, our legal systems tend to award the artists much more than just the bare right to get paid something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33321</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 20:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I became aware of Ellison, he&#039;s always been highly opinionated with a distinct perspective. I&#039;ve been more inclined to liken him to Warren Ellis in the past, but Ellison&#039;s recent actions make me rethink that comparison since I still like Ellis.

Tangent: Ellison did design on of the best graphic adventure games in adapting &quot;I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I became aware of Ellison, he&#8217;s always been highly opinionated with a distinct perspective. I&#8217;ve been more inclined to liken him to Warren Ellis in the past, but Ellison&#8217;s recent actions make me rethink that comparison since I still like Ellis.</p>
<p>Tangent: Ellison did design on of the best graphic adventure games in adapting &#8220;I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33318</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t agree, Joshua. An artist could defend her creative rights, for instance, by suing a publisher for fair payment (as with the Tasini electronic republication case) without demanding that a product be kept from the market.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree, Joshua. An artist could defend her creative rights, for instance, by suing a publisher for fair payment (as with the Tasini electronic republication case) without demanding that a product be kept from the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Macy</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/comment-page-1/#comment-33317</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Macy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2006/09/19/ellison-sues-fantagraphics/#comment-33317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything particularly strange about it.  Defending creative rights pretty much requires censorship of one form or another, or there&#039;s no recourse against someone violating those rights. Without knowing anything about the particular merits of the case, my general impression is that Ellison and Groth deserve eachother.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything particularly strange about it.  Defending creative rights pretty much requires censorship of one form or another, or there&#8217;s no recourse against someone violating those rights. Without knowing anything about the particular merits of the case, my general impression is that Ellison and Groth deserve eachother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
