<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR: What Not to Do: Archie Aiming at Marvel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:08:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Galvan</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/comment-page-1/#comment-46569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Galvan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/#comment-46569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I don&#039;t see this as a &quot;Stupid Publisher Trick&quot;, either.  Archie has a history of parodying the superhero genre, and I think that this is just another story in that tradition. I think that if a mainstream comic buyer sees this in a supermarket, they&#039;ll get the reference and maybe check it out. If they aren&#039;t in that group, it looks like an interesting story anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t see this as a &#8220;Stupid Publisher Trick&#8221;, either.  Archie has a history of parodying the superhero genre, and I think that this is just another story in that tradition. I think that if a mainstream comic buyer sees this in a supermarket, they&#8217;ll get the reference and maybe check it out. If they aren&#8217;t in that group, it looks like an interesting story anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/comment-page-1/#comment-44927</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/#comment-44927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m seeing several indications that Archie is trying to pursue the direct market more than they have in the past, and I&#039;m not sure at all it&#039;s a good idea for them. They have strength in a market that no other comics have access to (with their digests, whose only other competition was Disney Adventures, and I don&#039;t think they do many comics any more). I&#039;d rather see them trade on that strength (such as &quot;hey, Mr. Direct Market Retailer, we sell to this audience quite well, let&#039;s work together to get them into your stores&quot;) than trying to ride the coattails of the latest DM fad. 

Although I suspect you&#039;re right, in that the story may have little to nothing to actually remind readers of the Marvel marketing ploy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing several indications that Archie is trying to pursue the direct market more than they have in the past, and I&#8217;m not sure at all it&#8217;s a good idea for them. They have strength in a market that no other comics have access to (with their digests, whose only other competition was Disney Adventures, and I don&#8217;t think they do many comics any more). I&#8217;d rather see them trade on that strength (such as &#8220;hey, Mr. Direct Market Retailer, we sell to this audience quite well, let&#8217;s work together to get them into your stores&#8221;) than trying to ride the coattails of the latest DM fad. </p>
<p>Although I suspect you&#8217;re right, in that the story may have little to nothing to actually remind readers of the Marvel marketing ploy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Raiko</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/comment-page-1/#comment-44926</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Raiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/15/stupid-publisher-tricks-archie-aiming-at-marvel/#comment-44926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I dunno. This may be a &lt;i&gt;silly&lt;/i&gt; publisher trick, but I don&#039;t know that it&#039;s cringeworthily stupid like some other things you hear about.

Despite all the references to Marvel&#039;s Civil War in this (far too detailed) copy, the story seems to be fairly typical Archie fare that doesn&#039;t require a foreknowledge of the Marvel story (Certainly the pun &quot;Civil Chore&quot; is understandable whether or not you follow what Iron Man and Captain America are up to.) And if Archie thought they could drum up a little more interest from the traditional comics market by drawing comparisons to the Marvel story, that&#039;s understandable too (and, heck, might even work!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I dunno. This may be a <i>silly</i> publisher trick, but I don&#8217;t know that it&#8217;s cringeworthily stupid like some other things you hear about.</p>
<p>Despite all the references to Marvel&#8217;s Civil War in this (far too detailed) copy, the story seems to be fairly typical Archie fare that doesn&#8217;t require a foreknowledge of the Marvel story (Certainly the pun &#8220;Civil Chore&#8221; is understandable whether or not you follow what Iron Man and Captain America are up to.) And if Archie thought they could drum up a little more interest from the traditional comics market by drawing comparisons to the Marvel story, that&#8217;s understandable too (and, heck, might even work!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
