<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glyph Comics Awards Nominees Announced &amp; Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:58:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glyph Comic Awards Winners &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-66708</link>
		<dc:creator>Glyph Comic Awards Winners &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 11:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/#comment-66708</guid>
		<description>[...] was a near-sweep for Stagger Lee, a terrific book. I previously commented on the nominees.  Related Posts: Don&#8217;t Forget: ECBACC This Weekend &#167; Vote for the Glyph Comics Fan Award [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] was a near-sweep for Stagger Lee, a terrific book. I previously commented on the nominees.  Related Posts: Don&#8217;t Forget: ECBACC This Weekend &sect; Vote for the Glyph Comics Fan Award [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vote for the Glyph Comics Fan Award &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-51820</link>
		<dc:creator>Vote for the Glyph Comics Fan Award &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/#comment-51820</guid>
		<description>[...] seems to have missed the distinction that this is only the Fan Award, and there are nine others which are determined by the judges. That&#8217;s ok, it may not have been clear in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] seems to have missed the distinction that this is only the Fan Award, and there are nine others which are determined by the judges. That&#8217;s ok, it may not have been clear in the [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott h</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-45927</link>
		<dc:creator>scott h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/#comment-45927</guid>
		<description>female character, agent 355 from Y: The Last Man could have been a good choice. I love her anyways :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>female character, agent 355 from Y: The Last Man could have been a good choice. I love her anyways :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-45697</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy LeCharles Gonzalez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/02/21/glyph-comics-awards-nominees-announced-compared/#comment-45697</guid>
		<description>Kudos on a strong list of nominees this year.  I found the nomination process last year tough and enlightening as there was so much material I was unaware of and felt like a few less-deserving mainstream nominees slipped in as a result.  I was pretty happy with the ultimate winners, though, and this year&#039;s batch is an exciting mix of the familiar and the unknown.

Also nice to see the increased online attention the awards themselves are getting this time around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos on a strong list of nominees this year.  I found the nomination process last year tough and enlightening as there was so much material I was unaware of and felt like a few less-deserving mainstream nominees slipped in as a result.  I was pretty happy with the ultimate winners, though, and this year&#8217;s batch is an exciting mix of the familiar and the unknown.</p>
<p>Also nice to see the increased online attention the awards themselves are getting this time around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

