<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sad Realization: Legion Doesn&#8217;t Mean What It Used To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-52564</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-52564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ben, what a great metaphor. The Legion as Silly Putty -- and you can&#039;t get it back to what it once was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, what a great metaphor. The Legion as Silly Putty &#8212; and you can&#8217;t get it back to what it once was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben miller</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-52553</link>
		<dc:creator>ben miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-52553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful words on the Legion, particuarly in regard to a reader&#039;s reaction and the interior analysis of those reactions. I&#039;m a long-time, former Legion fan myself, but I also find my passion, or really any interest in the book to have vanished. It isn&#039;t even Waid&#039;s current interpretation that&#039;s problematic. I read it at first and thought it was the best idea and execution the Legion&#039;s had in years. For me (outside of a general disgust with DC), the problem is that the Legion has become so much taffy. It&#039;s pulled and stretched and reworked so many times that it ceases to be the Legion I love in my long ago youth. The stories and art might be entertaining, the characters might have the same names, but it&#039;s not the Legion in the sense of the connotations my mind concocts when it hears the word Legion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful words on the Legion, particuarly in regard to a reader&#8217;s reaction and the interior analysis of those reactions. I&#8217;m a long-time, former Legion fan myself, but I also find my passion, or really any interest in the book to have vanished. It isn&#8217;t even Waid&#8217;s current interpretation that&#8217;s problematic. I read it at first and thought it was the best idea and execution the Legion&#8217;s had in years. For me (outside of a general disgust with DC), the problem is that the Legion has become so much taffy. It&#8217;s pulled and stretched and reworked so many times that it ceases to be the Legion I love in my long ago youth. The stories and art might be entertaining, the characters might have the same names, but it&#8217;s not the Legion in the sense of the connotations my mind concocts when it hears the word Legion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Morrow</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50703</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless Waid has changed significantly, he takes online criticism personally, and out of proportion, so sniping at the Internet on the way out doesn&#039;t particularly surprise me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless Waid has changed significantly, he takes online criticism personally, and out of proportion, so sniping at the Internet on the way out doesn&#8217;t particularly surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Tate</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with you, Johanna.  It was the promise of Supergirl being drawn by a real artist that led me to the newest incarnation of the Legion, but I just didn&#039;t like any of them.  I liked how Waid handled Supergirl as this bright ray of hope, but everybody else when they didn&#039;t behave like cardboard was just so nasty.  The plots just didn&#039;t interest me--robots run amok, &quot;yawn.&quot;

Although an old Legion fan, I really loved and miss the Tom Peyer/Jeff Moy/W.C. Carani Legion.  That incarnation was so fun, and the kids were all right.  The stories were interesting.  The personalities were complementary.  I could tell who was speaking by the little nuances in dialogue.

Typical of DC, when it&#039;s broken they don&#039;t fix it, or the repair amounts to duct tape and a wad of gum.  When it isn&#039;t broken, they &quot;fix it.&quot;  Imagine... if Supergirl had been drawn by Jeff Moy.

Ray]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Johanna.  It was the promise of Supergirl being drawn by a real artist that led me to the newest incarnation of the Legion, but I just didn&#8217;t like any of them.  I liked how Waid handled Supergirl as this bright ray of hope, but everybody else when they didn&#8217;t behave like cardboard was just so nasty.  The plots just didn&#8217;t interest me&#8211;robots run amok, &#8220;yawn.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although an old Legion fan, I really loved and miss the Tom Peyer/Jeff Moy/W.C. Carani Legion.  That incarnation was so fun, and the kids were all right.  The stories were interesting.  The personalities were complementary.  I could tell who was speaking by the little nuances in dialogue.</p>
<p>Typical of DC, when it&#8217;s broken they don&#8217;t fix it, or the repair amounts to duct tape and a wad of gum.  When it isn&#8217;t broken, they &#8220;fix it.&#8221;  Imagine&#8230; if Supergirl had been drawn by Jeff Moy.</p>
<p>Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan C</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50585</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to hear about this - I understand exactly what you mean, Johanna. I&#039;d been reading this run of the LSH, after being out for about a decade.

I recall Waid being somewhat testy with you on the old CIS boards, and in general I wasn&#039;t crazy about the tone of his work back then, although I&#039;d liked him prior. But he&#039;d been doing good work here, and I&#039;m sorry to hear the Onlines have it in for him.

The animated LSH is for kids, true,but there&#039;s an odd frisson from seeing Night Girl,Polar Boy an dthe Subs animated. I&#039;d have been out of my mind when I was in grade school.

And the Other animated LSH, seen in the last Supergirl appearance in JLU, was a blast. Wish there was more of that - Rory Gilmore&#039;s boyfriend Logan voicing Brainy, Supergirl&#039;s crush? Unimprovable.

I hope that this LSH run continues, but Bedard is an unknown quantity. Too perfect a jumping of point,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear about this &#8211; I understand exactly what you mean, Johanna. I&#8217;d been reading this run of the LSH, after being out for about a decade.</p>
<p>I recall Waid being somewhat testy with you on the old CIS boards, and in general I wasn&#8217;t crazy about the tone of his work back then, although I&#8217;d liked him prior. But he&#8217;d been doing good work here, and I&#8217;m sorry to hear the Onlines have it in for him.</p>
<p>The animated LSH is for kids, true,but there&#8217;s an odd frisson from seeing Night Girl,Polar Boy an dthe Subs animated. I&#8217;d have been out of my mind when I was in grade school.</p>
<p>And the Other animated LSH, seen in the last Supergirl appearance in JLU, was a blast. Wish there was more of that &#8211; Rory Gilmore&#8217;s boyfriend Logan voicing Brainy, Supergirl&#8217;s crush? Unimprovable.</p>
<p>I hope that this LSH run continues, but Bedard is an unknown quantity. Too perfect a jumping of point,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob S.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Chris G. wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;I&#039;m sure part of DC and Marvel&#039;s turn to big stupid crossover events has been motivated by a desire to get people to need to read new books as soon as they come out...&lt;/i&gt;

Dan Didio has said as much, a while back -- I think he discussed the initiative as &quot;making Wednesdays important again.&quot;

&lt;b&gt;And earlier, I wrote:&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;I have to admit seeing Dawnstar&#039;s arm in JSA #1 offered a thrill that surprised me -- a relic of MY Legion was coming back, and up until then I hadn&#039;t even realized how much I missed them.&lt;/i&gt;

I got the same thrill reading the last page of today&#039;s issue of &lt;i&gt;Justice Society.&lt;/i&gt; Tease or not, something with the old LSH is coming...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Chris G. wrote:</b></p>
<p><i>I&#8217;m sure part of DC and Marvel&#8217;s turn to big stupid crossover events has been motivated by a desire to get people to need to read new books as soon as they come out&#8230;</i></p>
<p>Dan Didio has said as much, a while back &#8212; I think he discussed the initiative as &#8220;making Wednesdays important again.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>And earlier, I wrote:</b></p>
<p><i>I have to admit seeing Dawnstar&#8217;s arm in JSA #1 offered a thrill that surprised me &#8212; a relic of MY Legion was coming back, and up until then I hadn&#8217;t even realized how much I missed them.</i></p>
<p>I got the same thrill reading the last page of today&#8217;s issue of <i>Justice Society.</i> Tease or not, something with the old LSH is coming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris G.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50486</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll also use the change in writers as a drifting-away point, though I&#039;ve quite enjoyed Waid and Kitson&#039;s run -- it&#039;s the only book with ANY connection to DC&#039;s main line of titles that I&#039;m still reading at the moment.  

I&#039;ve found myself less and less interested even in monthly comics by creators I like -- if you&#039;d told me five years ago that Grant Morrison would be writing Batman, Kurt Busiek would be writing Superman, and Mark Waid would be writing Brave &amp; Bold, and that I&#039;d be reading NONE of those books as they came out I&#039;d have said you were nuts.  But as it is I&#039;d rather wait for a trade I can put on a shelf instead of a single issue that will be stacked in a box and pretty much forgotten about.  

I&#039;m sure part of DC and Marvel&#039;s turn to big stupid crossover events has been motivated by a desire to get people to need to read new books as soon as they come out, but those events are so brutal and mean and stupid that I&#039;d rather ignore than read them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll also use the change in writers as a drifting-away point, though I&#8217;ve quite enjoyed Waid and Kitson&#8217;s run &#8212; it&#8217;s the only book with ANY connection to DC&#8217;s main line of titles that I&#8217;m still reading at the moment.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found myself less and less interested even in monthly comics by creators I like &#8212; if you&#8217;d told me five years ago that Grant Morrison would be writing Batman, Kurt Busiek would be writing Superman, and Mark Waid would be writing Brave &amp; Bold, and that I&#8217;d be reading NONE of those books as they came out I&#8217;d have said you were nuts.  But as it is I&#8217;d rather wait for a trade I can put on a shelf instead of a single issue that will be stacked in a box and pretty much forgotten about.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure part of DC and Marvel&#8217;s turn to big stupid crossover events has been motivated by a desire to get people to need to read new books as soon as they come out, but those events are so brutal and mean and stupid that I&#8217;d rather ignore than read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50192</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael, if you look at the sales graph, sales may be higher, but they&#039;re quite volatile. From Jan 05 to Jan 06, readership plunged from over 60K to just over 30K. Half the audience left!

Then, they introduced Supergirl to the team, and readership went back to 55K. But in less than twelve months, the readership slips back down to about 33 K. 40% of the audience walked away again. 

This title has actually captured significant Direct Market action twice in the last two years, only to watch significant portions of the audience walk away. Before the 2nd reboot, the audience was only 25K, but it was a steady 25K. It&#039;s now 33K, but it&#039;s dropping like a rock, and facing a creative change. 

You can look at the total number of copies sold over the last two years, and say the reboot was a success. Or you can look at the fact that you held two &quot;tentpole&quot; events in two years- the reboot and Supergirl- and the audience, after giving it a chance, ran screaming. 

The only thing I can think of that would mitigate the sales drop is TPB sales. Only the first few issues of the post-ZH reboot were ever put into trade paperback. Legion Lost should have been put into a trade, I believe, based upon the skyrocketing prices it received in the back issue market. DC could have built an audience with those who wait for the trades. Instead, it rebooted the whole thing, and threw its weight behind Waid/Kitson.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, if you look at the sales graph, sales may be higher, but they&#8217;re quite volatile. From Jan 05 to Jan 06, readership plunged from over 60K to just over 30K. Half the audience left!</p>
<p>Then, they introduced Supergirl to the team, and readership went back to 55K. But in less than twelve months, the readership slips back down to about 33 K. 40% of the audience walked away again. </p>
<p>This title has actually captured significant Direct Market action twice in the last two years, only to watch significant portions of the audience walk away. Before the 2nd reboot, the audience was only 25K, but it was a steady 25K. It&#8217;s now 33K, but it&#8217;s dropping like a rock, and facing a creative change. </p>
<p>You can look at the total number of copies sold over the last two years, and say the reboot was a success. Or you can look at the fact that you held two &#8220;tentpole&#8221; events in two years- the reboot and Supergirl- and the audience, after giving it a chance, ran screaming. </p>
<p>The only thing I can think of that would mitigate the sales drop is TPB sales. Only the first few issues of the post-ZH reboot were ever put into trade paperback. Legion Lost should have been put into a trade, I believe, based upon the skyrocketing prices it received in the back issue market. DC could have built an audience with those who wait for the trades. Instead, it rebooted the whole thing, and threw its weight behind Waid/Kitson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50176</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I probably should clarify: I&#039;m not saying Legion is a bad book. I think it&#039;s one of the better superhero books out today. My post was made more to say that I&#039;d realized that I was a different person now, one I didn&#039;t expect to be (but not in a bad way).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably should clarify: I&#8217;m not saying Legion is a bad book. I think it&#8217;s one of the better superhero books out today. My post was made more to say that I&#8217;d realized that I was a different person now, one I didn&#8217;t expect to be (but not in a bad way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david brothers</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50085</link>
		<dc:creator>david brothers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I&#039;m the only real LoSH newbie here. I&#039;d only read two issues of Legion before the Waid/Kitson reboot. Both were late &#039;70s or early &#039;80s hand-me-downs from my uncle. One featured a cover with Tyroc screaming about how his planet or island was going to disappear for one hundred (one thousand?) years, and the other was when Superboy went back to the past and the Legion took his memories of the future. Beyond that, I&#039;d never gotten into the series.

But, the Waid/Kitson stuff, barring a two or three issue hiccup just when Supergirl joined, has been pretty interesting. He hooked me from the start with the idea of teenage rebellion as force for positive change and he made Brainy into one of my favorite characters.

I&#039;ll freely admit that I have no frame of reference here for story quality in relation to past LSH tales, though. In terms of hooking new readers, they seem to be doing okay. LoSH used to be one of those dark corners of the DCU that a Marvel Zombie like myself knew nothing about.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m the only real LoSH newbie here. I&#8217;d only read two issues of Legion before the Waid/Kitson reboot. Both were late &#8217;70s or early &#8217;80s hand-me-downs from my uncle. One featured a cover with Tyroc screaming about how his planet or island was going to disappear for one hundred (one thousand?) years, and the other was when Superboy went back to the past and the Legion took his memories of the future. Beyond that, I&#8217;d never gotten into the series.</p>
<p>But, the Waid/Kitson stuff, barring a two or three issue hiccup just when Supergirl joined, has been pretty interesting. He hooked me from the start with the idea of teenage rebellion as force for positive change and he made Brainy into one of my favorite characters.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll freely admit that I have no frame of reference here for story quality in relation to past LSH tales, though. In terms of hooking new readers, they seem to be doing okay. LoSH used to be one of those dark corners of the DCU that a Marvel Zombie like myself knew nothing about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pate</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50051</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Pate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 13:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand how you feel somewhat. I&#039;ve been a Legion fan for over 30 years. Back during the Levitz/Giffen heyday, it was my favorite title. And it hasn&#039;t been in a long time. I&#039;ve been reading the new book, and it&#039;s okay, but I just don&#039;t have a passion for it anymore. I yearn for the days of old.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand how you feel somewhat. I&#8217;ve been a Legion fan for over 30 years. Back during the Levitz/Giffen heyday, it was my favorite title. And it hasn&#8217;t been in a long time. I&#8217;ve been reading the new book, and it&#8217;s okay, but I just don&#8217;t have a passion for it anymore. I yearn for the days of old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Grabois</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-50001</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Grabois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-50001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray - I don&#039;t know if you can say that this reboot &quot;didn&#039;t work&quot;. Here are the &lt;a href=&quot;http://adventure247.blogspot.com/2007/01/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics-part-2-of.html&quot;&gt;sales figures&lt;/a&gt; for the last 10 years. 

Yes, sales on the current series have dropped, but sales on all comics are dropping (though maybe with different rates). However, sales are still higher than at any point in the last ten years, and that&#039;s got to count for something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if you can say that this reboot &#8220;didn&#8217;t work&#8221;. Here are the <a href="http://adventure247.blogspot.com/2007/01/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics-part-2-of.html">sales figures</a> for the last 10 years. </p>
<p>Yes, sales on the current series have dropped, but sales on all comics are dropping (though maybe with different rates). However, sales are still higher than at any point in the last ten years, and that&#8217;s got to count for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schee</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49998</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm I still read the LSH in trade form, and I&#039;ve thought Waid&#039;s run has had some iteresting ideas. You are right that it doesn&#039;t have the same magic, but then what really does over time?

When I was a kid just getting into comics GI Joe and Transformers, yet when they brought them back they weren&#039;t the same. As I was passing from those originally though I found and loved the LSH, and now they just don&#039;t have the sam oomph either.

I think it shows a certain amount of growth, when what you read  changes over time. I hope there are more readers like that, as I think a trap comic readers often fall into is reading the same thing over and over.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm I still read the LSH in trade form, and I&#8217;ve thought Waid&#8217;s run has had some iteresting ideas. You are right that it doesn&#8217;t have the same magic, but then what really does over time?</p>
<p>When I was a kid just getting into comics GI Joe and Transformers, yet when they brought them back they weren&#8217;t the same. As I was passing from those originally though I found and loved the LSH, and now they just don&#8217;t have the sam oomph either.</p>
<p>I think it shows a certain amount of growth, when what you read  changes over time. I hope there are more readers like that, as I think a trap comic readers often fall into is reading the same thing over and over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49994</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent a lot of time thinking about this tonight. Good topic, Johanna!

One thing that the Legion&#039;s lost is the audience&#039;s willingness to interact with the material and the characters and create new things based on the &quot;official&quot; comics. LSH spurred fan-fics, APAs, newsletters and amateur art based on what was in the official comics. I can&#039;t think of any other comic that generated that much fan activity- there&#039;s more Legion fan-fic than, say, Batman or Spider-Man fan-fic, even though the latter two characters are more well-known. 

Maybe DC should try encouraging that sort of spirit with the new Legion. Hiring big name talent didn&#039;t work for this reboot. Why not let the audience write the stories to some extent? Hold contests where the audience proposes story ideas, pick one, and get a decent writer to craft a story. Encourage the audience to create new costumes, new characters, and membership rosters. Restore the tradition of having the audience pick the team leader. And don&#039;t do this stuff one or two times- make audience participation essential to the Legion experience. The Legion could be &quot;the&quot; Web 2.0 comic, recreating the traditional fan experience that only the LSH had.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent a lot of time thinking about this tonight. Good topic, Johanna!</p>
<p>One thing that the Legion&#8217;s lost is the audience&#8217;s willingness to interact with the material and the characters and create new things based on the &#8220;official&#8221; comics. LSH spurred fan-fics, APAs, newsletters and amateur art based on what was in the official comics. I can&#8217;t think of any other comic that generated that much fan activity- there&#8217;s more Legion fan-fic than, say, Batman or Spider-Man fan-fic, even though the latter two characters are more well-known. </p>
<p>Maybe DC should try encouraging that sort of spirit with the new Legion. Hiring big name talent didn&#8217;t work for this reboot. Why not let the audience write the stories to some extent? Hold contests where the audience proposes story ideas, pick one, and get a decent writer to craft a story. Encourage the audience to create new costumes, new characters, and membership rosters. Restore the tradition of having the audience pick the team leader. And don&#8217;t do this stuff one or two times- make audience participation essential to the Legion experience. The Legion could be &#8220;the&#8221; Web 2.0 comic, recreating the traditional fan experience that only the LSH had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49991</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Johanna - I still have a bunch of graphic novels (probably over 30) that a bought in the last two years I&#039;d still like to read and I might pick up Joe Matt&#039;s upcoming &quot;Spent&quot; OGN as well as any future Peanuts volumes, which you mention in your other post. I might also consider another Gasoline Alley and Dennis the Menace collections, as I&#039;ve enjoyed the ones I have. As for anything new? Maybe American Born Chinese, but otherwise, not really sure. I&#039;m pretty much done with traditional superheroes though, as I&#039;ve no desire to keep up with monthly serials and as with the Legion, the characters have moved so far away from what I used to love about them, that I&#039;ve lost all interest. But you keep recommending and I&#039;ll keep reading. Maybe something will catch my eye...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Johanna &#8211; I still have a bunch of graphic novels (probably over 30) that a bought in the last two years I&#8217;d still like to read and I might pick up Joe Matt&#8217;s upcoming &#8220;Spent&#8221; OGN as well as any future Peanuts volumes, which you mention in your other post. I might also consider another Gasoline Alley and Dennis the Menace collections, as I&#8217;ve enjoyed the ones I have. As for anything new? Maybe American Born Chinese, but otherwise, not really sure. I&#8217;m pretty much done with traditional superheroes though, as I&#8217;ve no desire to keep up with monthly serials and as with the Legion, the characters have moved so far away from what I used to love about them, that I&#8217;ve lost all interest. But you keep recommending and I&#8217;ll keep reading. Maybe something will catch my eye&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49938</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still buy the Legion -- though I admit it&#039;s entirely out of habit. I don&#039;t even read them. I look at the burgeoning pile and tell myself I WILL read them... one day. For me, it all went wrong after the first year of Five Years Later. That first year, with Giffen on top form, was gripping. After that, it slid away quickly and never really recovered.

As for whether any writers DC might employ could recapture the old spirit of the Legion -- well, there&#039;s always Paul Levitz, or -- drum roll -- Jim Shooter... On the other hand, that might really be disappointing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still buy the Legion &#8212; though I admit it&#8217;s entirely out of habit. I don&#8217;t even read them. I look at the burgeoning pile and tell myself I WILL read them&#8230; one day. For me, it all went wrong after the first year of Five Years Later. That first year, with Giffen on top form, was gripping. After that, it slid away quickly and never really recovered.</p>
<p>As for whether any writers DC might employ could recapture the old spirit of the Legion &#8212; well, there&#8217;s always Paul Levitz, or &#8212; drum roll &#8212; Jim Shooter&#8230; On the other hand, that might really be disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Staeger</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49937</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Staeger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been really enjoying the Waid/Kitson LSH, but I have to admit seeing Dawnstar&#039;s arm in JSA #1 offered a thrill that surprised me -- a relic of MY Legion was coming back, and up until then I hadn&#039;t even realized how much I missed them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been really enjoying the Waid/Kitson LSH, but I have to admit seeing Dawnstar&#8217;s arm in JSA #1 offered a thrill that surprised me &#8212; a relic of MY Legion was coming back, and up until then I hadn&#8217;t even realized how much I missed them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Rawdon</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49917</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Rawdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh.  For me, it was Paul Levitz&#039; second go-round on the series (The Great Darkness Saga and going from there) which made me realize this wasn&#039;t the Legion I grew up with, as it seemed like all the characterization and fun had been leeched out of the series, and I was reading about these strangers in (more-or-less) the same uniforms.

The funny thing it, his &lt;i&gt;first&lt;/i&gt; go-round was only a few years earlier, and to me that&#039;s a great period in the series&#039; history.

So being at this point &lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; totally removed from my personal &quot;golden age&quot; for the Legion, I can sit back and enjoy (or not) the individual visions that new creators bring to the series.  In that sense, it&#039;s almost nice that the book gets rebooted every few years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh.  For me, it was Paul Levitz&#8217; second go-round on the series (The Great Darkness Saga and going from there) which made me realize this wasn&#8217;t the Legion I grew up with, as it seemed like all the characterization and fun had been leeched out of the series, and I was reading about these strangers in (more-or-less) the same uniforms.</p>
<p>The funny thing it, his <i>first</i> go-round was only a few years earlier, and to me that&#8217;s a great period in the series&#8217; history.</p>
<p>So being at this point <i>so</i> totally removed from my personal &#8220;golden age&#8221; for the Legion, I can sit back and enjoy (or not) the individual visions that new creators bring to the series.  In that sense, it&#8217;s almost nice that the book gets rebooted every few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49912</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray: No, I don&#039;t think it would... because you can&#039;t undo the past, regardless of how much superhero comics want to believe you can. All those stories inbetween happened, and so those characters won&#039;t be the same ones. (Plus, of more practical consideration, I don&#039;t know that any writers and artists DC would hire today would be capable of capturing the mood from back then.) 

Barry: I hope you&#039;re able to come back to comics at some point when there are books you&#039;re excited about reading. Thanks for still reading here in the meantime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray: No, I don&#8217;t think it would&#8230; because you can&#8217;t undo the past, regardless of how much superhero comics want to believe you can. All those stories inbetween happened, and so those characters won&#8217;t be the same ones. (Plus, of more practical consideration, I don&#8217;t know that any writers and artists DC would hire today would be capable of capturing the mood from back then.) </p>
<p>Barry: I hope you&#8217;re able to come back to comics at some point when there are books you&#8217;re excited about reading. Thanks for still reading here in the meantime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/comment-page-1/#comment-49893</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/03/19/sad-realization-legion-doesnt-mean-what-it-used-to/#comment-49893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a particularly interesting thread for me, as I barely read comics anymore. On some level I miss them, but on the other hand, there isn&#039;t much I&#039;m interested in reading. Even books I liked a few months ago, like Astonishing X-Men, I&#039;ve been buying but haven&#039;t had a chance to sit down and read. Like Johanna, I&#039;m more interested in TV shows on DVD like Scrubs and The Office UK, or listening to/playing music. Or just browsing for this or that on the web. I was thinking of picking up the new Buffy Season 8 series, but with it selling out and a 2nd printing coming out whenever, I&#039;ll either wait for the trade or skip it altogether, as I didn&#039;t like the direction the series was going in when it ended. 

So yeah, comics are pretty much a thing of the past for me. But I still like reading people&#039;s thoughts about them, so I&#039;ll still be checking out this site for the foreseeable future. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a particularly interesting thread for me, as I barely read comics anymore. On some level I miss them, but on the other hand, there isn&#8217;t much I&#8217;m interested in reading. Even books I liked a few months ago, like Astonishing X-Men, I&#8217;ve been buying but haven&#8217;t had a chance to sit down and read. Like Johanna, I&#8217;m more interested in TV shows on DVD like Scrubs and The Office UK, or listening to/playing music. Or just browsing for this or that on the web. I was thinking of picking up the new Buffy Season 8 series, but with it selling out and a 2nd printing coming out whenever, I&#8217;ll either wait for the trade or skip it altogether, as I didn&#8217;t like the direction the series was going in when it ended. </p>
<p>So yeah, comics are pretty much a thing of the past for me. But I still like reading people&#8217;s thoughts about them, so I&#8217;ll still be checking out this site for the foreseeable future. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
