<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agreeable LinkBlogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:13:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-65764</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 00:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-65764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I have to politly disagree with you, at least when it comes to American superhero comics.

The reasons I read most of these comics is because of the characters. The have incredibly well defined personalities. A good writer, in my humble opinon, should let these characters, essentially, &#039;speak&#039; for themselves. In an attempt at making fanscripts, I&#039;ve found that the characters with well-defined personalities, wrote themselves. As a writer, a could control the situation, but I could not control the character&#039;s reaction to the situation. That&#039;s how well defined they were to me. 

Brad Meltzer, however, IS trying to control the characters. He&#039;s not letting the character be themselves; he&#039;s just putting words in their mouth. As far as I&#039;m concerned, if you can&#039;t or don&#039;t let these characters write themselves, you eithier are not a good writer of American superhero comics, or you just don&#039;t care about the character. 

Really, these american superhero are a paid form of fanfiction (which is the only fiction I can do, which is why I want to work for DC/Marvel one day despite their stupidity), and the worst fanfiction are the one where the author tries to control too much. The best fanfictions are when the author sets up a situation and just describes what happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I have to politly disagree with you, at least when it comes to American superhero comics.</p>
<p>The reasons I read most of these comics is because of the characters. The have incredibly well defined personalities. A good writer, in my humble opinon, should let these characters, essentially, &#8216;speak&#8217; for themselves. In an attempt at making fanscripts, I&#8217;ve found that the characters with well-defined personalities, wrote themselves. As a writer, a could control the situation, but I could not control the character&#8217;s reaction to the situation. That&#8217;s how well defined they were to me. </p>
<p>Brad Meltzer, however, IS trying to control the characters. He&#8217;s not letting the character be themselves; he&#8217;s just putting words in their mouth. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, if you can&#8217;t or don&#8217;t let these characters write themselves, you eithier are not a good writer of American superhero comics, or you just don&#8217;t care about the character. </p>
<p>Really, these american superhero are a paid form of fanfiction (which is the only fiction I can do, which is why I want to work for DC/Marvel one day despite their stupidity), and the worst fanfiction are the one where the author tries to control too much. The best fanfictions are when the author sets up a situation and just describes what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-65504</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-65504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I have to disagree. I&#039;m sure people have written great stories with characters they didn&#039;t personally like, and sometimes, liking something too much makes you too cautious and safe. Or misleads you into following completely the wrong direction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I have to disagree. I&#8217;m sure people have written great stories with characters they didn&#8217;t personally like, and sometimes, liking something too much makes you too cautious and safe. Or misleads you into following completely the wrong direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-65502</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 00:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-65502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I don&#039;t think that they like the character too much. If they actually DID like the characters, they would be writing them well.

I really do want to write DC superheroes someday, but I&#039;m worried that it will just be interpreted as fanwank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think that they like the character too much. If they actually DID like the characters, they would be writing them well.</p>
<p>I really do want to write DC superheroes someday, but I&#8217;m worried that it will just be interpreted as fanwank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-64219</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 22:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-64219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know that I&#039;d consider Paul Dini a great source on creating fiction for girls, myself. And whether or not Smurfette is a good idea (I lean towards no), that doesn&#039;t contradict the essential problem of needing more good role models for girls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that I&#8217;d consider Paul Dini a great source on creating fiction for girls, myself. And whether or not Smurfette is a good idea (I lean towards no), that doesn&#8217;t contradict the essential problem of needing more good role models for girls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-64083</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-64083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Dini had an LJ post about See Jane a couple months back ( http://kingofbreakfast.livejournal.com/52614.html ).   The gist is that, while it&#039;s certainly a noble endeavor, Ms. Davis, well, doesn&#039;t seem to know what she&#039;s talking about.  Her best example of a negative portrayal of a female character in a cartoon is Smurfette, and she doesn&#039;t even mention the most obvious examples of positive and negative female role models in current animation, Kim Possible and Bratz.

But again, that was two months ago; maybe she&#039;s done some research since then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Dini had an LJ post about See Jane a couple months back ( <a href="http://kingofbreakfast.livejournal.com/52614.html" rel="nofollow">http://kingofbreakfast.livejournal.com/52614.html</a> ).   The gist is that, while it&#8217;s certainly a noble endeavor, Ms. Davis, well, doesn&#8217;t seem to know what she&#8217;s talking about.  Her best example of a negative portrayal of a female character in a cartoon is Smurfette, and she doesn&#8217;t even mention the most obvious examples of positive and negative female role models in current animation, Kim Possible and Bratz.</p>
<p>But again, that was two months ago; maybe she&#8217;s done some research since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schee</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-63969</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 07:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/05/01/agreeable-linkblogging/#comment-63969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My problem with how some of todays use creators use continuity, isn&#039;t so much the continuity. 

It is that some of the creators seem to have this skewed rememberence of a past story that they base the new story entirely on. Yet their memory is so skewed it makes no sense to anyone who doesn&#039;t see thing as they did.

BTW, I hope you do start enjoying the LSH Adventure book, since it looks like Teen Titans Go will be canceled soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with how some of todays use creators use continuity, isn&#8217;t so much the continuity. </p>
<p>It is that some of the creators seem to have this skewed rememberence of a past story that they base the new story entirely on. Yet their memory is so skewed it makes no sense to anyone who doesn&#8217;t see thing as they did.</p>
<p>BTW, I hope you do start enjoying the LSH Adventure book, since it looks like Teen Titans Go will be canceled soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
