Comments on: Bad Batgirl Cover

By: SofiWii

SofiWii — Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:57:44 +0000

i do agree with all that was said bfore and i think that Batgirl could do very + things if some stupid guys from DC didn’t make that she stay paraphlegic.
Sorry about my english, i can’t speak very well bcoz i’m portuguese, but i think that very person do agree with me.

By: Noli Irritare Leones » Blog Archive » Lust, Lechery and Objectification

Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:01:25 +0000

[...] the men idealized in a way that more emphasizes their strength, while the women are idealized and posed in a rather different way? And how about the way damsels in distress are [...]

By: More Batgirl Showcase Covers » Comics Worth Reading

More Batgirl Showcase Covers » Comics Worth Reading — Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:38:18 +0000

[...] response to discussion about the Batgirl Showcase cover choice, Marionette does some research into other possibilities, looking at what other cover art might have [...]

By: Johanna

Johanna — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:04:03 +0000

Yeah, that’s key, I think — DC had a selection of images to choose from, including action shots and sillier images. They chose this one. Why’d they think that was a good idea?

By: Shawn Hill

Shawn Hill — Thu, 19 Jul 2007 04:53:49 +0000

The cover’s a huge disappointment. Of all the images they could have chosen to dress up and crop and repaint, why that one? Does it really reflect something significant about Batgirl?

By: Johanna

Johanna — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:41:13 +0000

John, it would be easier to say “oh, that was just then” if the same sexist attitudes weren’t still on display today. Hard to gain the necessary distance that way.

By: John

John — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 17:21:28 +0000

I think the cover is funny and reflective of the time the stories in it take place. I wish the art itself were a little more reflective, so the retro quality of the humor were a little more tongue in cheek, but that’s me. Also, I don’t believe depicting a silly form of girlishness in a superhero character is necessarily sexist – there are plenty of other, more important issues regarding women in comics than outdated, very silly humor.

By: Things to Look at LinkBlogging » Comics Worth Reading

Things to Look at LinkBlogging » Comics Worth Reading — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:10:52 +0000

[...] Bacardi has more on the Batgirl cover change, with the relevant images and a couple more head-shaking covers from back in the [...]

By: thoughts from an empty head » DC Marketing 101

thoughts from an empty head » DC Marketing 101 — Tue, 17 Jul 2007 03:45:54 +0000

[...] Draper Carlson rightly pops a cork over the new Batgirl release, which was changed from a standard action-type sequence to [...]

By: Ray Tate

Ray Tate — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:16:54 +0000

Despite the ironic cover, this book is a blast!

Batgirl uses martial arts to throw and kick gunsels all over the place. She beats the snot out of them with karate chops and various holds and twists.

Sure. Some of the stories are a little sexist, but nobody gets crippled and nobody gets stuffed in a refrigerator.

Batman doesn’t tell Batgirl to get out of his city. He instead recognizes her intellect and welcomes her aid.

She’s throughout independent. At one point she even states that “she has no romantic interest in Batman whatsoever.” She’s Batgirl because she believes she can help and she feels most alive when in costume.

The artwork is action-packed and crisply reproduced. Passing up this book just because of the cover is a mistake. The collection is as refreshing as a hit of mountain air, and this book is a must purchase for any fan of Batgirl.

Ray

By: The Dane

The Dane — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:58:39 +0000

Really? I thought it was funny because it's sad. But I guess that's just how I roll.

By: caleb

caleb — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:36:28 +0000

Jim, anyone else stuck with it, I’d be happy to take it off your hands. I’ll pay for postage!

I thought the cover was funny. It’s a collection of stories from that time period, right? So I don’t see why the cover shouldn’t reflect the contents. Now, if it were the cover of the recent (fantastic) BATGIRL: YEAR ONE mini, then there might be some problems. Of course, if they wanted to do a dumb, sexist cover today, it would probably have been a lot more naked and violent.

By: Jim Kosmicki

Jim Kosmicki — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:05:52 +0000

and what about those of us who had to pre-order it because we don’t have a local shop? We’re stuck with it, no matter if it offends or not.

I’d love to hear from someone at DC editorial about why this decision was made.

By: Paul Sizer

Paul Sizer — Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:58:05 +0000

When I saw this cover in the comic store last week, I thought to myself “Wow, I’m glad Jane isn’t hear to see this” and then I thought “What’s that massive psychic scream, as if millions of souls cried out, and then were silent?”, the answer is all the others who saw this new bullet in the foot of DC’s credibility towards its female readers.