<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transfuzion Avoids the Direct Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Germain</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-90719</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Germain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-90719</guid>
		<description>From the sounds of things Gary&#039;s Transfusion is still direct market just not direct market through Diamond. In essence Transfusion is it&#039;s own distributor. distributing to patrons and retailers alike, and well before mass distribution this is how it was done and it seemed to workj pretty well for the comic market. I would like to leave you all with this final thought.  if everyone didn&#039;t buy their comics from diamond then diamond wouldn&#039;t be able to rape eveyone with their insanely high prices and insanely erratic policies, let alone the amount that they want to take from the creator which causes those insanely high prices.  But people do so Good Job Diamond that&#039;s just good business sense keep up the great work and keep raking in the dough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the sounds of things Gary&#8217;s Transfusion is still direct market just not direct market through Diamond. In essence Transfusion is it&#8217;s own distributor. distributing to patrons and retailers alike, and well before mass distribution this is how it was done and it seemed to workj pretty well for the comic market. I would like to leave you all with this final thought.  if everyone didn&#8217;t buy their comics from diamond then diamond wouldn&#8217;t be able to rape eveyone with their insanely high prices and insanely erratic policies, let alone the amount that they want to take from the creator which causes those insanely high prices.  But people do so Good Job Diamond that&#8217;s just good business sense keep up the great work and keep raking in the dough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Flag Publishing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Name dropping myself</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-84289</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Flag Publishing &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Name dropping myself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-84289</guid>
		<description>[...] came across another mention of my name from a while ago of which I was previously unaware. It seems a comment I made at the Comics Worth Reading blog was picked up by the author of the SLG LiveJournal: &#8220;As much as people complain about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] came across another mention of my name from a while ago of which I was previously unaware. It seems a comment I made at the Comics Worth Reading blog was picked up by the author of the SLG LiveJournal: &#8220;As much as people complain about [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transfuzion Launches, Plans Changed &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-80423</link>
		<dc:creator>Transfuzion Launches, Plans Changed &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 21:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-80423</guid>
		<description>[...] August, I covered Transfuzion Publishing&#8217;s first announcement, in which they declared their intention to avoid Diamond Distribution and sell direct to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] August, I covered Transfuzion Publishing&#8217;s first announcement, in which they declared their intention to avoid Diamond Distribution and sell direct to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed Walls</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-79261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-79261</guid>
		<description>Cool! Just eliminate the word &quot;market share&quot; out of my argument and allow my question to still stand. 

How could this method be used to attract people to new titles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! Just eliminate the word &#8220;market share&#8221; out of my argument and allow my question to still stand. </p>
<p>How could this method be used to attract people to new titles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Reed</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-79260</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-79260</guid>
		<description>Wow...not sure how I missed all of this, but I did.

I know it&#039;s rather late but I&#039;d like to respond to a few things before I comment overall.

Johanna said...&quot;That&#039;s kind of nebulous, especially that last part about &quot;other avenues&quot;. I&#039;m not clear on what makes this effort different from any webcomic creator releasing collections through Lulu.com.

Fair enough in questioning that.  But we&#039;re not relying on simply listing on Lulu and driving customers there from our websites.  We plan to promote to libraries and I have done a number of library visits and talks to get a good idea what goes on there and I have a good presence in many of them (mainly for the Penguin graphic novel adaptations).  I&#039;ve done book trade shows and while I don&#039;t believe the &quot;book market&quot; is the panacea that so many others do (I&#039;ve dealt with them many times...the returns can eat you alive), it can be a useful avenue.  The major focus will be promoting the &quot;genre&quot; aspect of the different titles.  For example, Jack the Ripper and Red Diaries to sites, stores, and other parties interested in mystery and crime.  That&#039;s a simple example and undoubtedly, will have to expend energy and creativity in developing those areas.  But the comic shops are already a special interest avenue...and that&#039;s superheroes.  Sure, there are exceptions but you can never plan on being an exception.

Also, by other avenues, it means digital distribution in the many differnt ways developing and exploitation, of course.

Johanna said...&quot;but I&#039;m confused why Reed thinks that books sold directly don&#039;t need just as much (or even more) promotion. Simply getting listed on Amazon won&#039;t magically bring sales.&quot;

Of course, we know that.  But spending money in the direct market seems to be a total waste.  Not promoting in one market doesn&#039;t negate promoting in another.

Since this was announced, we are now being offered by Diamond (February releases) but Wesley summed it up perfectly...Diamond is part of the equation and not the answer.  I have no animosity about the whole situation...it&#039;s just the way it is.

Dan&#039;s right about Tales from the Heart.  It would make a wonderful collection and if ever came to pass, I think it should be a Slave Labor book as they&#039;re the ones that took the initial chance on unknown creators and an untypical storyline.

And Dan is also right (he&#039;s right a lot)about the polarization of the market nowadays.  So, Dan if you do get some print on demand equiptment, I know a publisher who might give you some business...

To Jed...I think most of the publishers interested in the different avenues could give a shit about market share.  Marvel and DC have to please stockholders, they&#039;re trapped in the same corporate grab all public companies have to do...not just survive but grow or else heads will roll.

I was never a big believer in &quot;sales&quot;---to me, the profit was always more important.  A lot of times, that&#039;s two different games being played in the same market.

I discuss things a bit more in my blog which is at http://reedgary.blogspot.com/

Thanks Johanna.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;not sure how I missed all of this, but I did.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s rather late but I&#8217;d like to respond to a few things before I comment overall.</p>
<p>Johanna said&#8230;&#8221;That&#8217;s kind of nebulous, especially that last part about &#8220;other avenues&#8221;. I&#8217;m not clear on what makes this effort different from any webcomic creator releasing collections through Lulu.com.</p>
<p>Fair enough in questioning that.  But we&#8217;re not relying on simply listing on Lulu and driving customers there from our websites.  We plan to promote to libraries and I have done a number of library visits and talks to get a good idea what goes on there and I have a good presence in many of them (mainly for the Penguin graphic novel adaptations).  I&#8217;ve done book trade shows and while I don&#8217;t believe the &#8220;book market&#8221; is the panacea that so many others do (I&#8217;ve dealt with them many times&#8230;the returns can eat you alive), it can be a useful avenue.  The major focus will be promoting the &#8220;genre&#8221; aspect of the different titles.  For example, Jack the Ripper and Red Diaries to sites, stores, and other parties interested in mystery and crime.  That&#8217;s a simple example and undoubtedly, will have to expend energy and creativity in developing those areas.  But the comic shops are already a special interest avenue&#8230;and that&#8217;s superheroes.  Sure, there are exceptions but you can never plan on being an exception.</p>
<p>Also, by other avenues, it means digital distribution in the many differnt ways developing and exploitation, of course.</p>
<p>Johanna said&#8230;&#8221;but I&#8217;m confused why Reed thinks that books sold directly don&#8217;t need just as much (or even more) promotion. Simply getting listed on Amazon won&#8217;t magically bring sales.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, we know that.  But spending money in the direct market seems to be a total waste.  Not promoting in one market doesn&#8217;t negate promoting in another.</p>
<p>Since this was announced, we are now being offered by Diamond (February releases) but Wesley summed it up perfectly&#8230;Diamond is part of the equation and not the answer.  I have no animosity about the whole situation&#8230;it&#8217;s just the way it is.</p>
<p>Dan&#8217;s right about Tales from the Heart.  It would make a wonderful collection and if ever came to pass, I think it should be a Slave Labor book as they&#8217;re the ones that took the initial chance on unknown creators and an untypical storyline.</p>
<p>And Dan is also right (he&#8217;s right a lot)about the polarization of the market nowadays.  So, Dan if you do get some print on demand equiptment, I know a publisher who might give you some business&#8230;</p>
<p>To Jed&#8230;I think most of the publishers interested in the different avenues could give a shit about market share.  Marvel and DC have to please stockholders, they&#8217;re trapped in the same corporate grab all public companies have to do&#8230;not just survive but grow or else heads will roll.</p>
<p>I was never a big believer in &#8220;sales&#8221;&#8212;to me, the profit was always more important.  A lot of times, that&#8217;s two different games being played in the same market.</p>
<p>I discuss things a bit more in my blog which is at <a href="http://reedgary.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://reedgary.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Thanks Johanna.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebarklage.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Controlling the Distribution</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-74083</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebarklage.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Controlling the Distribution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 06:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-74083</guid>
		<description>[...] heartening to discover that other publishers are adopting the Barklage Comic Distribution Plan, bypassing the direct market and other mainstream distribution outlets in favor of website and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] heartening to discover that other publishers are adopting the Barklage Comic Distribution Plan, bypassing the direct market and other mainstream distribution outlets in favor of website and [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog@Newsarama &#187; Quote, Unquote</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73870</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog@Newsarama &#187; Quote, Unquote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73870</guid>
		<description>[...] SLG Publisher Dan Vado [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] SLG Publisher Dan Vado [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jed Walls</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed Walls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73785</guid>
		<description>This is another classic example of &quot;if you build it, they won&#039;t come.&quot;

These new systems sound fantastic, but until we are able to make a claim to legitimacy the indy publisher is all but shut out of market share dollars. 

What I see here is that people will go for older titles they&#039;ve been dying to see ... what will draw them to new titles?

Jed Walls</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another classic example of &#8220;if you build it, they won&#8217;t come.&#8221;</p>
<p>These new systems sound fantastic, but until we are able to make a claim to legitimacy the indy publisher is all but shut out of market share dollars. </p>
<p>What I see here is that people will go for older titles they&#8217;ve been dying to see &#8230; what will draw them to new titles?</p>
<p>Jed Walls</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 6, 2007: Heidi in the bubble</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73754</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalista - the news weblog of The Comics Journal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sept. 6, 2007: Heidi in the bubble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73754</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Things have gotten to the point where I am researching buying our own print-on-demand equipment to keep some of our stuff out there and to develop new creators.&#8221; - SLG Publishing founder Dan Vado [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] &#8220;Things have gotten to the point where I am researching buying our own print-on-demand equipment to keep some of our stuff out there and to develop new creators.&#8221; &#8211; SLG Publishing founder Dan Vado [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73538</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73538</guid>
		<description>As much as people complain about &quot;event fatigue&quot; I haven&#039;t seen enough people add up the numbers and realize that what DC and Marvel are doing with their massive flood of new titles, variant covers, crossovers, events and reprints is what they&#039;ve always done- try to flood the market to prevent other publishers from gaining a toe-hold (while also maximizing short-term profits for their investors of course).

It&#039;s been disappointing as a fan and a creator to see over the last 10 years the market recover from the dire 90s but yet the wealth and breadth of material available doesn&#039;t seem to find it&#039;s way onto shelves at any of my local stores which were much more supportive of indy comics 10-15 years ago than they seem to be today because they are ordering so much Marvel and DC they don&#039;t have any money left over to order stuff from the non-exclusives (and let&#039;s face it the exclusivity doesn&#039;t help since retailers realize they&#039;ll make more money selling another copy of Justice League than they would an issue of Optic Nerve).

It&#039;s amazing to me that I could find a lot more Slave Labor comics at my local shops 10 years ago when their quality and output wasn&#039;t near what it is today (outside one or two books perhaps) and yet the industry seems to shove them aside. DM shops are a closed circle which is cannibalizing itself while people applaud at how much DC and especially Marvel are eating- paying no attention to how little of the corpse is left! 

Meanwhile Slave Labor and other publishers threaten to actually increase the audience for comics but the system is trying to squeeze them out- in the end it may be a good thing when SL and other publishers find a way around the Diamond choke hold but like all such transitions it will surely leave some in the dust and it doesn&#039;t have to happen but that would require people thinking of the long-term health of the industry instead of their next quarter profits and continuing their monopolies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as people complain about &#8220;event fatigue&#8221; I haven&#8217;t seen enough people add up the numbers and realize that what DC and Marvel are doing with their massive flood of new titles, variant covers, crossovers, events and reprints is what they&#8217;ve always done- try to flood the market to prevent other publishers from gaining a toe-hold (while also maximizing short-term profits for their investors of course).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been disappointing as a fan and a creator to see over the last 10 years the market recover from the dire 90s but yet the wealth and breadth of material available doesn&#8217;t seem to find it&#8217;s way onto shelves at any of my local stores which were much more supportive of indy comics 10-15 years ago than they seem to be today because they are ordering so much Marvel and DC they don&#8217;t have any money left over to order stuff from the non-exclusives (and let&#8217;s face it the exclusivity doesn&#8217;t help since retailers realize they&#8217;ll make more money selling another copy of Justice League than they would an issue of Optic Nerve).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing to me that I could find a lot more Slave Labor comics at my local shops 10 years ago when their quality and output wasn&#8217;t near what it is today (outside one or two books perhaps) and yet the industry seems to shove them aside. DM shops are a closed circle which is cannibalizing itself while people applaud at how much DC and especially Marvel are eating- paying no attention to how little of the corpse is left! </p>
<p>Meanwhile Slave Labor and other publishers threaten to actually increase the audience for comics but the system is trying to squeeze them out- in the end it may be a good thing when SL and other publishers find a way around the Diamond choke hold but like all such transitions it will surely leave some in the dust and it doesn&#8217;t have to happen but that would require people thinking of the long-term health of the industry instead of their next quarter profits and continuing their monopolies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Oakes</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73432</link>
		<dc:creator>David Oakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 23:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73432</guid>
		<description>Wow.

And I mean that as more than just &quot;Dan Vado is going to spend a lot of money on the industry so I don&#039;t have to.&quot;  This excites me more than ll the universes, gladitorial events, television licenses, and celebrity authors put together, and turned to 11.

You go, Dan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.</p>
<p>And I mean that as more than just &#8220;Dan Vado is going to spend a lot of money on the industry so I don&#8217;t have to.&#8221;  This excites me more than ll the universes, gladitorial events, television licenses, and celebrity authors put together, and turned to 11.</p>
<p>You go, Dan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Vado</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Vado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73425</guid>
		<description>Rafael Nieves was the co-writer of Tales from the Heart (SLG was the publisher). I have wanted to do a collection of this series for years, however Rafael&#039;s co-writer has not responded to any of my queries about reprinting this. One would assume she is looking for a bigger book deal just like everyone else is. From the SLG end there has always been a willingness to collect this material altogether. In our warehouse somewhere are two book collections we did do years ago, if we can find copies we will put them up on our site for sale.

To comment on the direct-to-consumer initiative, all I can say is I understand the motivation. Honestly, on our nearly 22 years of publishing I have never felt a greater sense of disconnect from the direct market than I feel right now. I don&#039;t think I am alone in that feeling. Yet, the audience is out there based on our web sales and our sales at conventions. 

Things have gotten to the point where I am researching buying our own print-on-demand equipment to keep some of our stuff out there and to develop new creators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rafael Nieves was the co-writer of Tales from the Heart (SLG was the publisher). I have wanted to do a collection of this series for years, however Rafael&#8217;s co-writer has not responded to any of my queries about reprinting this. One would assume she is looking for a bigger book deal just like everyone else is. From the SLG end there has always been a willingness to collect this material altogether. In our warehouse somewhere are two book collections we did do years ago, if we can find copies we will put them up on our site for sale.</p>
<p>To comment on the direct-to-consumer initiative, all I can say is I understand the motivation. Honestly, on our nearly 22 years of publishing I have never felt a greater sense of disconnect from the direct market than I feel right now. I don&#8217;t think I am alone in that feeling. Yet, the audience is out there based on our web sales and our sales at conventions. </p>
<p>Things have gotten to the point where I am researching buying our own print-on-demand equipment to keep some of our stuff out there and to develop new creators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kosmicki</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73422</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kosmicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 17:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73422</guid>
		<description>I think that Nieves was involved with Tales from the Heart -- if this gets that in print as a collection, I&#039;m there. I don&#039;t care what hoops I have to go through to get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Nieves was involved with Tales from the Heart &#8212; if this gets that in print as a collection, I&#8217;m there. I don&#8217;t care what hoops I have to go through to get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Green</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/comment-page-1/#comment-73415</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2007/08/30/stupid-publisher-tricks-avoiding-the-direct-market/#comment-73415</guid>
		<description>I think Gary makes some very valid points from the standpoint of an indy publisher in today&#039;s market. As a new-ish indy publisher myself, I&#039;ve designed my business model so that Diamond is just part of the equation not the answer. With Marvel and DC flooding the market, retailers only have so much to spend- and that includes those &quot;indy-friendly retailers&quot;. So indy publishers are put in the position where we have to take advantage of every distribution channel there is. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if more indy publishers make the web their number 1 method of distribution in a handful of years.

Wesley Craig Green, publisher
Ambrosia Publishing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gary makes some very valid points from the standpoint of an indy publisher in today&#8217;s market. As a new-ish indy publisher myself, I&#8217;ve designed my business model so that Diamond is just part of the equation not the answer. With Marvel and DC flooding the market, retailers only have so much to spend- and that includes those &#8220;indy-friendly retailers&#8221;. So indy publishers are put in the position where we have to take advantage of every distribution channel there is. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if more indy publishers make the web their number 1 method of distribution in a handful of years.</p>
<p>Wesley Craig Green, publisher<br />
Ambrosia Publishing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

