<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Birds of Prey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spaced &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-97609</link>
		<dc:creator>Spaced &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-97609</guid>
		<description>[...] terror of the blank page and one of the most wonderfully realistic female characters ever on TV. Liz came back to watch this with me, because she&#8217;s a Pegg fan but hadn&#8217;t previously heard of Spaced. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FFE4E1; ">
<p>[...] terror of the blank page and one of the most wonderfully realistic female characters ever on TV. Liz came back to watch this with me, because she&#8217;s a Pegg fan but hadn&#8217;t previously heard of Spaced. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96774</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96774</guid>
		<description>Basically, some of the acting was super-clunky (poor Shemar Moore) and the effects weak.  I watched it, but not super-enthusiastically.  Dinah Meyer wasn't bad, I got to like Harley, and it did feature Joe Flanigan as a guest bad guy who was basically defeated by a pride parade.  It's hard to object to a Joe Flanigan guest shot anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, some of the acting was super-clunky (poor Shemar Moore) and the effects weak.  I watched it, but not super-enthusiastically.  Dinah Meyer wasn&#8217;t bad, I got to like Harley, and it did feature Joe Flanigan as a guest bad guy who was basically defeated by a pride parade.  It&#8217;s hard to object to a Joe Flanigan guest shot anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96766</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96766</guid>
		<description>I don't know what DC's attitude is, but I do think it's not a bad thing for DC to have a somewhat known differently abled hero, in the service of having a more diverse universe. And her message, that she's going to find a new way to contribute no matter what, is a good one. 

I don't think people would complain as much about the freak-of-the-week structure if the individual episodes were good and interesting. After all, Buffy did something similar in early days, and those are still very rewatchable (with a couple of notable clunkers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what DC&#8217;s attitude is, but I do think it&#8217;s not a bad thing for DC to have a somewhat known differently abled hero, in the service of having a more diverse universe. And her message, that she&#8217;s going to find a new way to contribute no matter what, is a good one. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think people would complain as much about the freak-of-the-week structure if the individual episodes were good and interesting. After all, Buffy did something similar in early days, and those are still very rewatchable (with a couple of notable clunkers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96759</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96759</guid>
		<description>Two unrelated points:

"You know, that reminds me of something. It’s been a while since I’ve read all those Knightfall/KnightQuest/KnightEend issues, but was did we ever see Batman talk with Oracle at all about the fact that he was now in a wheelchair as well? What about any conversations after Bruce’s back was miraculously healed by Dr. Kinsolving?"

This has come up a few times over the years in various ways - sometimes as meta-commentary couched in the dialogue.  Toward the end of Chuck's run on the title, IIRC (and it's been a while so maybe I don't), Babs was even offered a chance to take a dip in a Lazarus Pit (which is how Dinah got her Canary Cry back) but declined.  My impression -perhaps KC would know and be willing to comment - is that DC editorial beleives Barbara is just much more interesting character as Oracle than Batgirl and giving her the use of her legs would, um... what exactly?  Make it impossible for her to still be Oracle?  The whole thing breaks down under scrutiny but you probably get the idea.

As for the villain of the week premise:  The producers of Smallville took similar heat during season one for the "Kryptonite-irradiated freak-of-the-week" format - and if you try watching Smallville Season One on DVD, as I have, it is pretty tedious.  But the producers' reasoning on this was logically sound:  They claimed the average viewer would only catch 1 out of every 3-4 episodes and so they wanted to make every ep pretty much done-in-one to make it accessible for as many viewers as possible.  As the series progressed, they moved away from that format - but therein lies the danger:  I was a big fan but lost track of it due to various circumstances around season four and never really got back into it again because I couldn't figure out much of the backstory or the motivations of the characters.  ----  Sound familiar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two unrelated points:</p>
<p>&#8220;You know, that reminds me of something. It’s been a while since I’ve read all those Knightfall/KnightQuest/KnightEend issues, but was did we ever see Batman talk with Oracle at all about the fact that he was now in a wheelchair as well? What about any conversations after Bruce’s back was miraculously healed by Dr. Kinsolving?&#8221;</p>
<p>This has come up a few times over the years in various ways - sometimes as meta-commentary couched in the dialogue.  Toward the end of Chuck&#8217;s run on the title, IIRC (and it&#8217;s been a while so maybe I don&#8217;t), Babs was even offered a chance to take a dip in a Lazarus Pit (which is how Dinah got her Canary Cry back) but declined.  My impression -perhaps KC would know and be willing to comment - is that DC editorial beleives Barbara is just much more interesting character as Oracle than Batgirl and giving her the use of her legs would, um&#8230; what exactly?  Make it impossible for her to still be Oracle?  The whole thing breaks down under scrutiny but you probably get the idea.</p>
<p>As for the villain of the week premise:  The producers of Smallville took similar heat during season one for the &#8220;Kryptonite-irradiated freak-of-the-week&#8221; format - and if you try watching Smallville Season One on DVD, as I have, it is pretty tedious.  But the producers&#8217; reasoning on this was logically sound:  They claimed the average viewer would only catch 1 out of every 3-4 episodes and so they wanted to make every ep pretty much done-in-one to make it accessible for as many viewers as possible.  As the series progressed, they moved away from that format - but therein lies the danger:  I was a big fan but lost track of it due to various circumstances around season four and never really got back into it again because I couldn&#8217;t figure out much of the backstory or the motivations of the characters.  &#8212;-  Sound familiar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96755</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96755</guid>
		<description>"Another thing I didn’t like was how they failed to understand the brains/brawn character dymamic of the Birds of Prey comics. Not getting that meant Helena did all the work and Barbara/Oracle was given very little to do, which sucked."

Good point, I think BoP suffered the way the animated Legion suffered -- the writers knew how to write action but not how to write superheroes who's powers weren't visual, like Saturn Girl or Oracle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Another thing I didn’t like was how they failed to understand the brains/brawn character dymamic of the Birds of Prey comics. Not getting that meant Helena did all the work and Barbara/Oracle was given very little to do, which sucked.&#8221;</p>
<p>Good point, I think BoP suffered the way the animated Legion suffered &#8212; the writers knew how to write action but not how to write superheroes who&#8217;s powers weren&#8217;t visual, like Saturn Girl or Oracle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glaurung</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96753</link>
		<dc:creator>Glaurung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96753</guid>
		<description>My partner and I watched this when it aired.  I lost interest quickly, driven away by the godawful writing more than by how much they were deviating from the source material (another commenter has noted the horridly clunky opening credit exposition and how it showed the producers had no faith in their ability to convey the backstory through the actual writing of the episodes).  

I also remember how very annoyed I was by how Barbara/Oracle was supposed to be paraplegic but was always sitting and moving in a way that would be impossible for someone who is paraplegic to sit and move -- one of the episodes had the three leads lounging and talking in a U-shaped couch, and there's no freaking way Oracle would have been able to get to the place she was sitting without either crawling over the coffee table or the back of the couch.

Another thing I didn't like was how they failed to understand the brains/brawn character dymamic of the Birds of Prey comics.  Not getting that meant Helena did all the work and Barbara/Oracle was given very little to do, which sucked.

IIRC, the showbiz news coverage of the time talked about how the show's producer was not very experienced, and the network failed to assign her a good showrunner exec, which explained a lot about the clumsy, awkward feel to the show as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner and I watched this when it aired.  I lost interest quickly, driven away by the godawful writing more than by how much they were deviating from the source material (another commenter has noted the horridly clunky opening credit exposition and how it showed the producers had no faith in their ability to convey the backstory through the actual writing of the episodes).  </p>
<p>I also remember how very annoyed I was by how Barbara/Oracle was supposed to be paraplegic but was always sitting and moving in a way that would be impossible for someone who is paraplegic to sit and move &#8212; one of the episodes had the three leads lounging and talking in a U-shaped couch, and there&#8217;s no freaking way Oracle would have been able to get to the place she was sitting without either crawling over the coffee table or the back of the couch.</p>
<p>Another thing I didn&#8217;t like was how they failed to understand the brains/brawn character dymamic of the Birds of Prey comics.  Not getting that meant Helena did all the work and Barbara/Oracle was given very little to do, which sucked.</p>
<p>IIRC, the showbiz news coverage of the time talked about how the show&#8217;s producer was not very experienced, and the network failed to assign her a good showrunner exec, which explained a lot about the clumsy, awkward feel to the show as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96736</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96736</guid>
		<description>Raymond Tate wrote: "Two, Birds of Prey does not take place in the wholecloth of the DC universe. Therefore, there is no supernatural or high tech way to permanently repair Babs’ spine."

You know, that reminds me of something. It's been a while since I've read all those Knightfall/KnightQuest/KnightEend issues, but was did we ever see Batman talk with Oracle at all about the fact that he was now in a wheelchair as well? What about any conversations after Bruce's back was miraculously healed by Dr. Kinsolving?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raymond Tate wrote: &#8220;Two, Birds of Prey does not take place in the wholecloth of the DC universe. Therefore, there is no supernatural or high tech way to permanently repair Babs’ spine.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, that reminds me of something. It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve read all those Knightfall/KnightQuest/KnightEend issues, but was did we ever see Batman talk with Oracle at all about the fact that he was now in a wheelchair as well? What about any conversations after Bruce&#8217;s back was miraculously healed by Dr. Kinsolving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Coyle</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96734</guid>
		<description>One of the more ludicrous bits of the show was the father of Shemar Moore's character. In the first episode he appeared in, he was played by Stephen McHattie. In what universe would they be related? 

Even better, since the father was severely injured at the end of said episode, he came back played by another actor &lt;I&gt;with a completely different body type and facial structure&lt;/I&gt;, Mitch Pileggi. Now they just think we're idiots. 

As charming as I find her, I must admit Ashley Scott was definitely the show's weak link, hammering the slow burn angst button for, well, everything. 

Mia Sara became the scene stealer, because, well, her character wasn't feeling sorry for herself all the time, instead enacting a plan for REVENGE, albeit a ridiculous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the more ludicrous bits of the show was the father of Shemar Moore&#8217;s character. In the first episode he appeared in, he was played by Stephen McHattie. In what universe would they be related? </p>
<p>Even better, since the father was severely injured at the end of said episode, he came back played by another actor <i>with a completely different body type and facial structure</i>, Mitch Pileggi. Now they just think we&#8217;re idiots. </p>
<p>As charming as I find her, I must admit Ashley Scott was definitely the show&#8217;s weak link, hammering the slow burn angst button for, well, everything. </p>
<p>Mia Sara became the scene stealer, because, well, her character wasn&#8217;t feeling sorry for herself all the time, instead enacting a plan for REVENGE, albeit a ridiculous one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96729</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96729</guid>
		<description>Some great background y'all are sharing, thanks! 

Chas, if I had to guess why the women dropped the show, it's because the soap opera wasn't very entertaining. Based on this first episode, it felt flat instead of involving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great background y&#8217;all are sharing, thanks! </p>
<p>Chas, if I had to guess why the women dropped the show, it&#8217;s because the soap opera wasn&#8217;t very entertaining. Based on this first episode, it felt flat instead of involving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Tate</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96724</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96724</guid>
		<description>I pre-ordered the set, which just arrived today, because I enjoyed this show for several reasons.

One, Babs is employing her brilliant mind to reverse her condition.  She isn't giving up.  This isn't reality.  This is fiction.  In one episode, she walks again, but with great pain.  

I've always wondered about this.  If Babs is so smart, so technologically savvy in the comic series, why hasn't she come up with a way to repair the damage?

Two, Birds of Prey does not take place in the wholecloth of the DC universe.  Therefore, there is no supernatural or high tech way to permanently repair Babs' spine.  

Babs might a solution in the television series, but there's no Zatanna, nor are there such things as advanced Kryptonian or Thanagarian science readily available to her.   

Three, the Huntress is based on the earth-two original hero not the generic post-Crisis vigilante that lacks a single tie to Batman and hasn't a good reason to exist.  The writer/creator of the show was a fan of the original Huntress, not Valerie's cousin.

Four, Batman occasionally shows up in flashback and isn't portrayed as an emotionless, unfeeling manipulator.  Batgirl was his trusted partner.  

Five, we don't know exactly why Batman left Gotham City.  Grief over Catwoman's death doesn't seem likely.  Now that he knows about Helena, it would be more likely that he would return.  So, I always suspected that Batman is searching the globe, seeking a way to fix Babs' spine, which is a helluva lot more than he did for her in the comics.  Granted, this is merely hypothetical, but I'm sticking with it.

Ray

P.S. SPOILER.








Young Dinah isn't the Black Canary.  She's the daughter of Black Canary, who shows up later, complete with sonic scream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pre-ordered the set, which just arrived today, because I enjoyed this show for several reasons.</p>
<p>One, Babs is employing her brilliant mind to reverse her condition.  She isn&#8217;t giving up.  This isn&#8217;t reality.  This is fiction.  In one episode, she walks again, but with great pain.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered about this.  If Babs is so smart, so technologically savvy in the comic series, why hasn&#8217;t she come up with a way to repair the damage?</p>
<p>Two, Birds of Prey does not take place in the wholecloth of the DC universe.  Therefore, there is no supernatural or high tech way to permanently repair Babs&#8217; spine.  </p>
<p>Babs might a solution in the television series, but there&#8217;s no Zatanna, nor are there such things as advanced Kryptonian or Thanagarian science readily available to her.   </p>
<p>Three, the Huntress is based on the earth-two original hero not the generic post-Crisis vigilante that lacks a single tie to Batman and hasn&#8217;t a good reason to exist.  The writer/creator of the show was a fan of the original Huntress, not Valerie&#8217;s cousin.</p>
<p>Four, Batman occasionally shows up in flashback and isn&#8217;t portrayed as an emotionless, unfeeling manipulator.  Batgirl was his trusted partner.  </p>
<p>Five, we don&#8217;t know exactly why Batman left Gotham City.  Grief over Catwoman&#8217;s death doesn&#8217;t seem likely.  Now that he knows about Helena, it would be more likely that he would return.  So, I always suspected that Batman is searching the globe, seeking a way to fix Babs&#8217; spine, which is a helluva lot more than he did for her in the comics.  Granted, this is merely hypothetical, but I&#8217;m sticking with it.</p>
<p>Ray</p>
<p>P.S. SPOILER.</p>
<p>Young Dinah isn&#8217;t the Black Canary.  She&#8217;s the daughter of Black Canary, who shows up later, complete with sonic scream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiki</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96723</guid>
		<description>What made me drop the show after a few episodes was its reliance on the meta menace of the week - or at least it seemed like that at the time.  Relationships never got a chance to develop because they were trying to work too many guest stars into an already crowded show.  Though the episode with Dinah's mother was pretty good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What made me drop the show after a few episodes was its reliance on the meta menace of the week - or at least it seemed like that at the time.  Relationships never got a chance to develop because they were trying to work too many guest stars into an already crowded show.  Though the episode with Dinah&#8217;s mother was pretty good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chasdom</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96721</link>
		<dc:creator>chasdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96721</guid>
		<description>When the show was originally on, it reminded me a lot of Charmed, which my girlfriend-at-the-time watched religiously. 3 women with a difficult relationship teaming up to fight the baddie-of-the-week. The antagonists in Birds of Prey always had weak set-ups and motivations, but so did the baddies in Charmed, and my girlfriend never seemed to mind; it was just exciting window-dressing for the soap opera aspects.

For the same reasons as Charmed, it didn't hold my (male) interest very much, even if the premise and characters were appealing. As for why the female viewership abandoned the show as well, I don't know. Maybe it wasn't marketed to them in the first place, thus missing the key demographic? But it was on the WB, which had high female viewership, so that doesn't make much sense.

Just some random thoughts. I wouldn't mind seeing it again, actually, especially with there being only 13 episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the show was originally on, it reminded me a lot of Charmed, which my girlfriend-at-the-time watched religiously. 3 women with a difficult relationship teaming up to fight the baddie-of-the-week. The antagonists in Birds of Prey always had weak set-ups and motivations, but so did the baddies in Charmed, and my girlfriend never seemed to mind; it was just exciting window-dressing for the soap opera aspects.</p>
<p>For the same reasons as Charmed, it didn&#8217;t hold my (male) interest very much, even if the premise and characters were appealing. As for why the female viewership abandoned the show as well, I don&#8217;t know. Maybe it wasn&#8217;t marketed to them in the first place, thus missing the key demographic? But it was on the WB, which had high female viewership, so that doesn&#8217;t make much sense.</p>
<p>Just some random thoughts. I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing it again, actually, especially with there being only 13 episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96720</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96720</guid>
		<description>I remember watching maybe 5 or 6 episodes before I lost interest.  The changes in dynamic didn't bother me that much, since I haven't read the comics, though I remember finding it odd that Barbara would use a motorized wheelchair -- until I realized it placed her head higher, making it easier to frame shots with other characters.

The thing that really didn't work for me was the fact that they basically set it in the Marvel Universe instead of the DC Universe, with mutants renamed as Metas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember watching maybe 5 or 6 episodes before I lost interest.  The changes in dynamic didn&#8217;t bother me that much, since I haven&#8217;t read the comics, though I remember finding it odd that Barbara would use a motorized wheelchair &#8212; until I realized it placed her head higher, making it easier to frame shots with other characters.</p>
<p>The thing that really didn&#8217;t work for me was the fact that they basically set it in the Marvel Universe instead of the DC Universe, with mutants renamed as Metas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Raiko</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96719</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Raiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96719</guid>
		<description>"One big positive effect of the show, however, was the effect on the comic..."

Plus, I like to think that the existence of the BIRDS OF PREY tv show, somehow, in some way, influenced DC's decision to finally collect the Paul Levitz Huntress stories in that HUNTRESS: DARK KNIGHT DAUGHTER tpb. 

OK, sure, there wasn't any direct tie-in--the book was published something like 3 or 4 years after the show was cancelled--but, still, I like to think that having a Batman's daughther character kicking around on the teevee got at least some wheels turning in the reprint division...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One big positive effect of the show, however, was the effect on the comic&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Plus, I like to think that the existence of the BIRDS OF PREY tv show, somehow, in some way, influenced DC&#8217;s decision to finally collect the Paul Levitz Huntress stories in that HUNTRESS: DARK KNIGHT DAUGHTER tpb. </p>
<p>OK, sure, there wasn&#8217;t any direct tie-in&#8211;the book was published something like 3 or 4 years after the show was cancelled&#8211;but, still, I like to think that having a Batman&#8217;s daughther character kicking around on the teevee got at least some wheels turning in the reprint division&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96718</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96718</guid>
		<description>I recall making it most of the way through the first episode and then really losing interest.  This was before I or nayone I knew had DVR, and I wasn't motivated to remember to tape it so that was pretty much it for me.  As one of the other commenters noted, it just seemed too "off-model" from the comic for me to relate to - and I have generally been a defender of various "reimaginings" when comics material is adapted to other media.  

One big positive effect of the show, however, was the effect on the comic.  Typical of DC (and Marvel, too), changes were made in the editiorial direction of the comic series to make it hew closer to the show.  So, Huntress was brought in as a regualar player, a move which warranted a new creative team - Gail Simone and Ed Benes.  Good call.  The book had been floundering and directionless for about a year since Chuck Dixon left and I was about to drop it. Gail's run really re-energized it.  Too bad she's gone - I'm still having a hard time with the stupid moves DC has made to nullify all the positive character-development Gail did with Dinah. I'm still picking it up regularly but it no longer hits the top of my reading pile and as I look for places to cut back, I can't guarantee its' safety.

But back to the show: Was I the only one who had a hard time processing "Mr. Pitt" as Alfred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall making it most of the way through the first episode and then really losing interest.  This was before I or nayone I knew had DVR, and I wasn&#8217;t motivated to remember to tape it so that was pretty much it for me.  As one of the other commenters noted, it just seemed too &#8220;off-model&#8221; from the comic for me to relate to - and I have generally been a defender of various &#8220;reimaginings&#8221; when comics material is adapted to other media.  </p>
<p>One big positive effect of the show, however, was the effect on the comic.  Typical of DC (and Marvel, too), changes were made in the editiorial direction of the comic series to make it hew closer to the show.  So, Huntress was brought in as a regualar player, a move which warranted a new creative team - Gail Simone and Ed Benes.  Good call.  The book had been floundering and directionless for about a year since Chuck Dixon left and I was about to drop it. Gail&#8217;s run really re-energized it.  Too bad she&#8217;s gone - I&#8217;m still having a hard time with the stupid moves DC has made to nullify all the positive character-development Gail did with Dinah. I&#8217;m still picking it up regularly but it no longer hits the top of my reading pile and as I look for places to cut back, I can&#8217;t guarantee its&#8217; safety.</p>
<p>But back to the show: Was I the only one who had a hard time processing &#8220;Mr. Pitt&#8221; as Alfred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Raiko</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96716</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Raiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96716</guid>
		<description>With regard to: "I’m surprised to see Birds of Prey out on DVD, since I discovered recently that few people remembered it."

On the other hand, if I recall correctly, BIRDS OF PREY always scored very high on TVShowsonDVD.com's list of most-requested-but-yet-unreleased TV shows, so there was something of a demand for it. And if rights issues still preclude the Adam West Batman TV series from getting to DVD, it makes some sense to release new Batman-related DVD product out along with the new movie.

Anyway, what I recall of the BIRDS OF PREY series from watching it pretty much jibes with your assessement. I remember thinking that it looked good in terms of sets and art direction, and the cast was reasonably solid (Dina Meyer is one of the better seemingly-consigned-to-genre-work actresses there is, IMO), but the whole thing didn't fully come together.

Which, I suppose, makes a fine candidate for a DVD release for a collector's shelf, even if it doesn't make for must-see TV viewing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to: &#8220;I’m surprised to see Birds of Prey out on DVD, since I discovered recently that few people remembered it.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, if I recall correctly, BIRDS OF PREY always scored very high on TVShowsonDVD.com&#8217;s list of most-requested-but-yet-unreleased TV shows, so there was something of a demand for it. And if rights issues still preclude the Adam West Batman TV series from getting to DVD, it makes some sense to release new Batman-related DVD product out along with the new movie.</p>
<p>Anyway, what I recall of the BIRDS OF PREY series from watching it pretty much jibes with your assessement. I remember thinking that it looked good in terms of sets and art direction, and the cast was reasonably solid (Dina Meyer is one of the better seemingly-consigned-to-genre-work actresses there is, IMO), but the whole thing didn&#8217;t fully come together.</p>
<p>Which, I suppose, makes a fine candidate for a DVD release for a collector&#8217;s shelf, even if it doesn&#8217;t make for must-see TV viewing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96711</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96711</guid>
		<description>The show really lost me right at the beginning when they felt the need to give the audience that long explanation by Alfred. That suggested to me they didn't have the confidence to explain who these characters were through the stories (though, IIRC, wasn't there some dialogue also explaining Helena's background?) and that lack of confidence probably also explains why the Babs/Helena relationship lacked much depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The show really lost me right at the beginning when they felt the need to give the audience that long explanation by Alfred. That suggested to me they didn&#8217;t have the confidence to explain who these characters were through the stories (though, IIRC, wasn&#8217;t there some dialogue also explaining Helena&#8217;s background?) and that lack of confidence probably also explains why the Babs/Helena relationship lacked much depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent J. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96709</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96709</guid>
		<description>If I recall, the first couple of episodes did great ratings for the WB, and it was expected to be picked up for a whole season. But the ratings started tanking after those early episodes. 

I enjoyed the show a lot and can't wait to pick up the DVDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall, the first couple of episodes did great ratings for the WB, and it was expected to be picked up for a whole season. But the ratings started tanking after those early episodes. </p>
<p>I enjoyed the show a lot and can&#8217;t wait to pick up the DVDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill D.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96708</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/2008/07/14/birds-of-prey/#comment-96708</guid>
		<description>I always found the show too "off model" from the source material to watch regularly (and the idea of Batman just up and leaving Gotham always seemed pretty ridiculous), but I did think Dina Meyer made an awesome Babs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always found the show too &#8220;off model&#8221; from the source material to watch regularly (and the idea of Batman just up and leaving Gotham always seemed pretty ridiculous), but I did think Dina Meyer made an awesome Babs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
