»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«


New Live-Action Scooby-Doo Straight to Cable/Video
August 2, 2008

I actually enjoyed watching the Scooby-Doo movies — the cast was good (and into what they were doing), and the plots goofy fun with some nudge nudge moments for adults (like Shaggy’s smoke-filled van).

Scooby-Doo cover
Scooby-Doo
Buy this DVD
Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed cover
Scooby-Doo 2: Monsters Unleashed
Buy this DVD


So I was surprised to hear that they were making another one. (I thought 2 hadn’t done well enough to consider it.) Scooby-Doo: In the Beginning is “an all-new live-action prequel” due out in Fall 2009. It’s set in high school, where the gang meet for the first time, and it’s a co-production between the Cartoon Network (where the film will debut at the same time it’s released on DVD) and Warner Premiere, the studio’s production arm for original content for release “direct to consumer”. They’re talking about it now because principal photography has begun in Vancouver.

Like so many of the current brand extensions/sequels — recently, WarGames: The Dead Code, Lost Boys: The Tribe, Bring It On: In It to Win It (4th in the series), and The Cutting Edge: Going for the Gold have all been brought to my attention — it features no one I’ve ever heard of. Rob Amell plays Freddy, and the rest of the cast are described as “relative newcomers”: Kaitlyn Melton as Daphne, Hayley Alcroft as Velma, and Nick Palatas as Shaggy (the key role, I think, since he’s got to make the computer-generated dog believable).

The director is Brian Levant, who (and this part of the press release amused me) “has significant experience in the live-action/CG arena with both canines and Hanna-Barbara properties. Levant directed the popular dog-starring films Beethoven and Snow Dogs and was behind the camera for the Hanna-Barbera cartoon-brought-to-life versions of The Flintstones and The Flintstones in Viva Las Vegas.”

Can you believe Scooby-Doo started in 1969? He’s had 10 TV series, 7 specials, and 11 direct-to-video films (soon to be 12). As for why this choice, the two previous movies are cited as making a total of nearly $458 million worldwide.

I find it interesting that Cartoon Network is doing more live-action programming. This one is a bit of a stretch but understandable, I guess, since Scooby started as a cartoon. I still don’t get why they’re adapting The Vanishers, since that time-travel story would be easier to do animated and it has no cartoon connection. But many networks are branching out these dates, since the competition is ever-increasing, and they may think it’s of interest to their audience, regardless of format.

4 Responses  
James Schee writes:  

Very interesting. After doing a websearch on the actors names and I found that they are really young, hence why you haven’t heard of them.

It appears that this is the first acting role for the one playing Shaggy. (found a “Way to go!” blog entry from an acting school)

Also its a bit more racially diverse cast as well.

 
Cal writes:  

It’s also interesting in light of the slow but steady vanishing of so many HB staples from Cartoon Network. Some of the Sundry Scooby programs pop up, and Tom & Jerry.

But The Flintstones, the Jetsons et al live on in DVD and ads only, it seems. I’ve been lobbying my local cable for the Boomerang network to no avail.

So, I’m glad to see a version of these characters pop up. Considering their lineage traces back to The Many Loves Of DObie Gillis ( another now-unseen staple that I’ve great affection for), 2009 will span 50 years!

 
Bill Beechler writes:  

Those older cartoons, Jetsons and Flintstones and the like, are seen every day on Cartoon Network’s other channel, Boomerang.

 
Johanna writes:  

But as Cal said, his cable company doesn’t carry Boomerang, so that’s not an option, unfortunately.

 

»  Substance: WordPress   »  Style: Ahren Ahimsa
Copyright 2009-2014 Johanna Draper Carlson