<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Headline LinkBlogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clockwork Game Returns &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-118899</link>
		<dc:creator>Clockwork Game Returns &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-118899</guid>
		<description>[...] a year later, she reconsidered, first announcing the strip&#8217;s ending, then making it a hiatus. Now, the wait is over! The strip is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] a year later, she reconsidered, first announcing the strip&#8217;s ending, then making it a hiatus. Now, the wait is over! The strip is [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-103162</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-103162</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m pretty sure they&#039;ve realized that ... although no one knows what to do about it. Alternately, they&#039;re not willing to address the issue directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m pretty sure they&#8217;ve realized that &#8230; although no one knows what to do about it. Alternately, they&#8217;re not willing to address the issue directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirjorge</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-103160</link>
		<dc:creator>sirjorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-103160</guid>
		<description>I wonder when the comic book industry is going to realize that a lot of people are downloading comics now via cbr files.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the comic book industry is going to realize that a lot of people are downloading comics now via cbr files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Carter</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102725</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102725</guid>
		<description>Most people remember the DC explosion/implosion (or at least have heard about it form us old-timers). The explosion was when they raised their prices from 35Ã‚Â¢ to 50Ã‚Â¢ and increased the story page count from 17 to 25 (and as previously noted, also added a bunch of titles). As we all know it bombed (for all sorts of reasons) and DC soon dropped the story page count back down to 17 and dropped the price to 40Ã‚Â¢. So comics still cost more, you just didn&#039;t get anything for the extra cost.

What many people forget is that just a few years later, DC once again raised their prices to 50Ã‚Â¢ and added 8 more story pages (again, mostly through back-up stories, but within a few years the extra pages ended up become part of the main story); this time the increase worked and the price &amp; page count stuck. 

Later when they increased to 60Ã‚Â¢, the story page count was increased to 27 pages!

Back in the day, an increase in price nearly always was accompanied by an increased in perceived value: either more pages, better quality paper, fewer ads, etc. Then as time went on, that value would be whittled away, until the next price increase and the cycle continued.

I see adding more pages with an accompanying price increase from $3 to $4 as being more tenable than Marvel&#039;s &quot;we&#039;ll increase our prices to $4 on our top titles and you&#039;ll smile and like it&quot; approach. But then I&#039;m probably sadly wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people remember the DC explosion/implosion (or at least have heard about it form us old-timers). The explosion was when they raised their prices from 35Ã‚Â¢ to 50Ã‚Â¢ and increased the story page count from 17 to 25 (and as previously noted, also added a bunch of titles). As we all know it bombed (for all sorts of reasons) and DC soon dropped the story page count back down to 17 and dropped the price to 40Ã‚Â¢. So comics still cost more, you just didn&#8217;t get anything for the extra cost.</p>
<p>What many people forget is that just a few years later, DC once again raised their prices to 50Ã‚Â¢ and added 8 more story pages (again, mostly through back-up stories, but within a few years the extra pages ended up become part of the main story); this time the increase worked and the price &amp; page count stuck. </p>
<p>Later when they increased to 60Ã‚Â¢, the story page count was increased to 27 pages!</p>
<p>Back in the day, an increase in price nearly always was accompanied by an increased in perceived value: either more pages, better quality paper, fewer ads, etc. Then as time went on, that value would be whittled away, until the next price increase and the cycle continued.</p>
<p>I see adding more pages with an accompanying price increase from $3 to $4 as being more tenable than Marvel&#8217;s &#8220;we&#8217;ll increase our prices to $4 on our top titles and you&#8217;ll smile and like it&#8221; approach. But then I&#8217;m probably sadly wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobH</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102615</link>
		<dc:creator>BobH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102615</guid>
		<description>Jamie, the DC Explosion was more than two years after Infantino left DC. I think you&#039;re mixing up multiple stories of unreliable veracity to get your version of the events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie, the DC Explosion was more than two years after Infantino left DC. I think you&#8217;re mixing up multiple stories of unreliable veracity to get your version of the events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schee</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102613</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102613</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I tried going in to separate my dislike for what happened to Ted to give this a chance. There were some interesting things here, like not keeping the secret from his family. His friends were okay too, Jamie himself was sort of annoying.  

Yet overall it didn&#039;t seem to have a real... cohesive direction. It probably wasn&#039;t helped by, at least from an outside view, being SO involved with all the various DC crossovers that came one right after another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I tried going in to separate my dislike for what happened to Ted to give this a chance. There were some interesting things here, like not keeping the secret from his family. His friends were okay too, Jamie himself was sort of annoying.  </p>
<p>Yet overall it didn&#8217;t seem to have a real&#8230; cohesive direction. It probably wasn&#8217;t helped by, at least from an outside view, being SO involved with all the various DC crossovers that came one right after another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102606</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102606</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know that&#039;s it &quot;not accepting change&quot; -- the potential of the Jamie series was often greater than the actual, unfortunately. I liked it for what it could have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know that&#8217;s it &#8220;not accepting change&#8221; &#8212; the potential of the Jamie series was often greater than the actual, unfortunately. I liked it for what it could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schee</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102604</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102604</guid>
		<description>For me the idea of backup stories is interesting, but I really don&#039;t like any of the characters being used.

If I hadn&#039;t already switched to trades on it, the $1 increase for Booster + adding a character I don&#039;t like would have sent me running to trades.

I tried Jamie&#039;s series, and it should have worked for me. Since I like teen characters, am from Texas and love original writer John Rogers Leverage TV show.

Yet it didn&#039;t work for me, but I&#039;m willing to admit that I really liked Ted Kord as well. (my one old fogie, can&#039;t accept change moment?:) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the idea of backup stories is interesting, but I really don&#8217;t like any of the characters being used.</p>
<p>If I hadn&#8217;t already switched to trades on it, the $1 increase for Booster + adding a character I don&#8217;t like would have sent me running to trades.</p>
<p>I tried Jamie&#8217;s series, and it should have worked for me. Since I like teen characters, am from Texas and love original writer John Rogers Leverage TV show.</p>
<p>Yet it didn&#8217;t work for me, but I&#8217;m willing to admit that I really liked Ted Kord as well. (my one old fogie, can&#8217;t accept change moment?:) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102601</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102601</guid>
		<description>Alan, yes, but that affection -- and the resulting unwillingness to accept the new character -- is part of what killed the title before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, yes, but that affection &#8212; and the resulting unwillingness to accept the new character &#8212; is part of what killed the title before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Food or Comics &#124; A roundup of money-related news</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102594</link>
		<dc:creator>Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Food or Comics &#124; A roundup of money-related news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102594</guid>
		<description>[...] prices accompanied by the addition of back-up features &#8212; seems a little familiar, blogger Johanna Draper Carlson notes that&#8217;s because it sort of happened at DC before, in the mid- to late &#8217;70s: As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] prices accompanied by the addition of back-up features &#8212; seems a little familiar, blogger Johanna Draper Carlson notes that&#8217;s because it sort of happened at DC before, in the mid- to late &#8217;70s: As [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Sepinwall</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102592</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Sepinwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102592</guid>
		<description>Johanna, I&#039;m assuming they put Blue Beetle into Booster&#039;s comic because of the affection fans have for Booster&#039;s friendship with the previous Beetle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johanna, I&#8217;m assuming they put Blue Beetle into Booster&#8217;s comic because of the affection fans have for Booster&#8217;s friendship with the previous Beetle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Comics A.M. &#124; The comics Internet in two minutes</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102591</link>
		<dc:creator>Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources - Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment &#187; Comics A.M. &#124; The comics Internet in two minutes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102591</guid>
		<description>[...] Webcomics &#124; Cartoonist Jane Irwin is rethinking her earlier decision to end her historical webcomic Clockwork Comics because of her concerns over the depiction of racial stereotypes: &#8220;&#8230; I&#8217;m reconsidering my stance on permanently ending the book. Let&#8217;s call it a hiatus for now; the end of the first chapter&#8217;s a good stopping point. In any event, I need to pull back and do a lot more reading and researching, then re-evaluate the first half of the book to see if it&#8217;s something I can fix to better match the much darker tone of the second half.&#8221; [Clockwork Comics, via Johanna Draper Carlson] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] Webcomics | Cartoonist Jane Irwin is rethinking her earlier decision to end her historical webcomic Clockwork Comics because of her concerns over the depiction of racial stereotypes: &#8220;&#8230; I&#8217;m reconsidering my stance on permanently ending the book. Let&#8217;s call it a hiatus for now; the end of the first chapter&#8217;s a good stopping point. In any event, I need to pull back and do a lot more reading and researching, then re-evaluate the first half of the book to see if it&#8217;s something I can fix to better match the much darker tone of the second half.&#8221; [Clockwork Comics, via Johanna Draper Carlson] [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102588</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102588</guid>
		<description>I wrote a couple of reviews a couple of years ago for ForeWord -- not the pay program, just the print magazine. The editor kept telling me to rewrite to use more examples and less opinion, so I&#039;m not surprised that they&#039;re pushing them for marketing. If they&#039;re simple factual description, anyone could use them... but why would they want to? 

They also, as soon as I contributed, signed me up for their marketing email, constantly pushing me to buy ads and be part of &quot;special issues&quot;. That was annoying. 

Don, you make the point in your comments that marketers should send review copies instead of news releases to reviewers, but I&#039;m noticing more and more the opposite. DC, especially, seems to want coverage of upcoming comics based on what they say about it instead of actual content. I figure it&#039;s fishing, seeing who&#039;s interested, and a way to cut down their mailing costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a couple of reviews a couple of years ago for ForeWord &#8212; not the pay program, just the print magazine. The editor kept telling me to rewrite to use more examples and less opinion, so I&#8217;m not surprised that they&#8217;re pushing them for marketing. If they&#8217;re simple factual description, anyone could use them&#8230; but why would they want to? </p>
<p>They also, as soon as I contributed, signed me up for their marketing email, constantly pushing me to buy ads and be part of &#8220;special issues&#8221;. That was annoying. </p>
<p>Don, you make the point in your comments that marketers should send review copies instead of news releases to reviewers, but I&#8217;m noticing more and more the opposite. DC, especially, seems to want coverage of upcoming comics based on what they say about it instead of actual content. I figure it&#8217;s fishing, seeing who&#8217;s interested, and a way to cut down their mailing costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Coville</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102587</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Coville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 05:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102587</guid>
		<description>The DC Explosion was about an explosion in the number of titles. 

Marvel was pumping out a lot of different titles in the late 70s, Carmine Infantino proposed to Stan a limit of titles their companies would put out. Stan refused, said if they titles were selling he would continue to pump out more books. Carmine was afraid the newsstands (with limited rack space) would reduce the amount of DC titles they carried to get the Marvel books. He felt once they lost that rack space it would really hurt the company and be difficult to get back. He responded by pumping out a bunch of titles, hence the DC explosion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DC Explosion was about an explosion in the number of titles. </p>
<p>Marvel was pumping out a lot of different titles in the late 70s, Carmine Infantino proposed to Stan a limit of titles their companies would put out. Stan refused, said if they titles were selling he would continue to pump out more books. Carmine was afraid the newsstands (with limited rack space) would reduce the amount of DC titles they carried to get the Marvel books. He felt once they lost that rack space it would really hurt the company and be difficult to get back. He responded by pumping out a bunch of titles, hence the DC explosion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102583</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102583</guid>
		<description>Your comment about selling a review is understandable, but the implication from &lt;I&gt;ForeWord&lt;/I&gt; -- that publishers will be able to use the review for marketing purposes -- seems to be that the $305 will garner one a positive review.

While I can see the value in charging a fee for an awards program in order to cover costs, for example, your original post about &lt;I&gt;ForeWord&lt;/I&gt;&#039;s awards does make it clear that the fee charged was bringing in a lot more than just enough to cover the cost of the program. Your objections under those circumstances are quite merited.

BTW, Mr. Luedke has posted a response to some of my criticisms of his promotional material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment about selling a review is understandable, but the implication from <i>ForeWord</i> &#8212; that publishers will be able to use the review for marketing purposes &#8212; seems to be that the $305 will garner one a positive review.</p>
<p>While I can see the value in charging a fee for an awards program in order to cover costs, for example, your original post about <i>ForeWord</i>&#8216;s awards does make it clear that the fee charged was bringing in a lot more than just enough to cover the cost of the program. Your objections under those circumstances are quite merited.</p>
<p>BTW, Mr. Luedke has posted a response to some of my criticisms of his promotional material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102582</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102582</guid>
		<description>Funny, I feel the opposite. Selling a review, &lt;strong&gt;as long as you don&#039;t promise a particular outcome or slant&lt;/strong&gt;, is less objectionable to me than fixing an award. In the latter case, you&#039;re potentially leaving out the best material because they didn&#039;t pay you, and that&#039;s scummy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I feel the opposite. Selling a review, <strong>as long as you don&#8217;t promise a particular outcome or slant</strong>, is less objectionable to me than fixing an award. In the latter case, you&#8217;re potentially leaving out the best material because they didn&#8217;t pay you, and that&#8217;s scummy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don MacPherson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/03/12/headline-linkblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-102579</link>
		<dc:creator>Don MacPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=5768#comment-102579</guid>
		<description>I completely missed your original essay about &lt;I&gt;ForeWord&lt;/I&gt;&#039;s awards. I&#039;m not as critical as you are of entry fees for awards; I can see the need to keep potential entrants from mail-bombing an awards program. But the review-for-fee service? Highly objectionable.

By the way, Johanna, how much do I owe you for the link? :) &lt;I&gt;(Kidding! I&#039;m kidding, folks!)&lt;/I&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely missed your original essay about <i>ForeWord</i>&#8216;s awards. I&#8217;m not as critical as you are of entry fees for awards; I can see the need to keep potential entrants from mail-bombing an awards program. But the review-for-fee service? Highly objectionable.</p>
<p>By the way, Johanna, how much do I owe you for the link? :) <i>(Kidding! I&#8217;m kidding, folks!)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

