<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watchmen: Director&#8217;s Cut</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sucker Punch &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-120330</link>
		<dc:creator>Sucker Punch &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-120330</guid>
		<description>[...] how empowering a female fantasy it is as the vision of Zack Snyder. Like his previous movie, Watchmen, the soundtrack is heavy-handed and intrusive, as though he&#8217;s making a series of music videos [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] how empowering a female fantasy it is as the vision of Zack Snyder. Like his previous movie, Watchmen, the soundtrack is heavy-handed and intrusive, as though he&#8217;s making a series of music videos [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Movie to Comic Problem Again &#8212; What X-Men Do I Read? &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-119879</link>
		<dc:creator>The Movie to Comic Problem Again &#8212; What X-Men Do I Read? &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-119879</guid>
		<description>[...] a typical problem when it comes to superhero movies. Projects like 300 or Watchmen have strong tie-in sales, because there&#8217;s one book to buy. Single-creator movies (such as Sin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] a typical problem when it comes to superhero movies. Projects like 300 or Watchmen have strong tie-in sales, because there&#8217;s one book to buy. Single-creator movies (such as Sin [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Losers Get Lucky &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-111506</link>
		<dc:creator>The Losers Get Lucky &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 12:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-111506</guid>
		<description>[...] following built on roles in such disparate properties as Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, Supernatural and Watchmen. I&#8217;d never seen Short or Jaenada before, but I&#8217;d definitely watch them again. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] following built on roles in such disparate properties as Grey&#8217;s Anatomy, Supernatural and Watchmen. I&#8217;d never seen Short or Jaenada before, but I&#8217;d definitely watch them again. The [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comic Business LinkBlogging &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-110909</link>
		<dc:creator>Comic Business LinkBlogging &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-110909</guid>
		<description>[...] buzz doesn&#8217;t translate into real customer money, as well as a sign that (combined with Watchmen&#8217;s performance, poorer than expected) R-rated superhero movies are not a good idea. It will be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] buzz doesn&#8217;t translate into real customer money, as well as a sign that (combined with Watchmen&#8217;s performance, poorer than expected) R-rated superhero movies are not a good idea. It will be [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The West Coast Era of Comics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-110509</link>
		<dc:creator>The West Coast Era of Comics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-110509</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Pilgrim &#8212; are better done and better received than others &#8212; Whiteout, Surrogates, Watchmen &#8212; but we&#8217;re long past the days of movies based on comics being considered only cheesy, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] Scott Pilgrim &#8212; are better done and better received than others &#8212; Whiteout, Surrogates, Watchmen &#8212; but we&#8217;re long past the days of movies based on comics being considered only cheesy, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Human Target Debuts Tomorrow &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-108438</link>
		<dc:creator>Human Target Debuts Tomorrow &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-108438</guid>
		<description>[...] consists of Chi McBride (Pushing Daisies, Boston Public) and Jackie Earle Haley (most recently, Watchmen &#8212; he was Rorschach).  Jackie Earle Haley and Chi McBride [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] consists of Chi McBride (Pushing Daisies, Boston Public) and Jackie Earle Haley (most recently, Watchmen &#8212; he was Rorschach).  Jackie Earle Haley and Chi McBride [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-107187</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-107187</guid>
		<description>i have never read the comic but have seen the original version of the film. the film was one of the best i have seen in a long time in every way. it expressed ideas about contemporary culture that needed to be said. there is nothing you can really do about the vast masses out there who cannot comprehend complex ideas/plots because they are pig ignorant by choice or circumstance.... people can only percieve what they allow themselves to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have never read the comic but have seen the original version of the film. the film was one of the best i have seen in a long time in every way. it expressed ideas about contemporary culture that needed to be said. there is nothing you can really do about the vast masses out there who cannot comprehend complex ideas/plots because they are pig ignorant by choice or circumstance&#8230;. people can only percieve what they allow themselves to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watchmen: The Ultimate Cut Due November 3 &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-106455</link>
		<dc:creator>Watchmen: The Ultimate Cut Due November 3 &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-106455</guid>
		<description>[...] film will combine the Tales of the Black Freighter animated mini-feature with the expanded movie Watchmen: Director&#8217;s Cut, released on DVD two months ago. New to this package is a commentary track with Zack Snyder and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] film will combine the Tales of the Black Freighter animated mini-feature with the expanded movie Watchmen: Director&#8217;s Cut, released on DVD two months ago. New to this package is a commentary track with Zack Snyder and [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Great Webcomics Today: Sinfest, Comic Critics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105676</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Great Webcomics Today: Sinfest, Comic Critics &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105676</guid>
		<description>[...] Also very thought-provoking today was the latest Comic Critics! strip, in which a very sensible fan explains why he doesn&#8217;t feel the need to see Watchmen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] Also very thought-provoking today was the latest Comic Critics! strip, in which a very sensible fan explains why he doesn&#8217;t feel the need to see Watchmen. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fraser</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105432</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105432</guid>
		<description>Zack Snyder has proven himself to be a strong , even innovative, stylist and a good director of action setpieces. He hasn&#039;t so far proven that he has any intellectual capacity beyond that. The Watchemen movie tends to indicate that he doesn&#039;t have strong grasp of the character of the work he was adapting, which for material like Watchmen, which rises or falls on it&#039;s intellectual aspirations, is a deal breaker.

There is no such thing as &#039;Audience Incompetence&#039;. You could argue that a film is , ahead of it&#039;s time. In 1969 2001: A Space Odyssey was ahead of the audience. However that film was obviously visionary and hugely ambitious, even to people who didn&#039;t &#039;get it&#039; at the time and the track record of Kubrick is almost without peer in the history of Cinema. He managed to make something that wildly surpassed his source material ( Arthur C. Clarkes SENTINEL short story. ) So far Snyder has yet to make anything that aspires to anything higher than making people buy Popcorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zack Snyder has proven himself to be a strong , even innovative, stylist and a good director of action setpieces. He hasn&#8217;t so far proven that he has any intellectual capacity beyond that. The Watchemen movie tends to indicate that he doesn&#8217;t have strong grasp of the character of the work he was adapting, which for material like Watchmen, which rises or falls on it&#8217;s intellectual aspirations, is a deal breaker.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as &#8216;Audience Incompetence&#8217;. You could argue that a film is , ahead of it&#8217;s time. In 1969 2001: A Space Odyssey was ahead of the audience. However that film was obviously visionary and hugely ambitious, even to people who didn&#8217;t &#8216;get it&#8217; at the time and the track record of Kubrick is almost without peer in the history of Cinema. He managed to make something that wildly surpassed his source material ( Arthur C. Clarkes SENTINEL short story. ) So far Snyder has yet to make anything that aspires to anything higher than making people buy Popcorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105429</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105429</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that Directorial Incompetence is a defence.

I am not sure this is necessarily a situation Directorial Incompetence.  For one, the director has shown himself competant in the past.  And as for audiences not appreciating what was intended...that happens to a lot of directors.  Some &quot;classic&quot; films were met with a resounding thud upon release and only became treated as works of art years later.  While I am not claiming this will be the case for Watchmen, to suggest initial audience reaction means the film failed as a peice of work really jumps the gun.  It could very well be audience incompetence for missing the point of the slow mo and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that Directorial Incompetence is a defence.</p>
<p>I am not sure this is necessarily a situation Directorial Incompetence.  For one, the director has shown himself competant in the past.  And as for audiences not appreciating what was intended&#8230;that happens to a lot of directors.  Some &#8220;classic&#8221; films were met with a resounding thud upon release and only became treated as works of art years later.  While I am not claiming this will be the case for Watchmen, to suggest initial audience reaction means the film failed as a peice of work really jumps the gun.  It could very well be audience incompetence for missing the point of the slow mo and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aramis</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105422</link>
		<dc:creator>aramis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105422</guid>
		<description>I agree with Allyson.

They had no idea the novel would become such a hit, just happened to be, I believe its because it relates to the mind set and fears of that era, the approach was something new, with different kind of &quot;super&quot; heroes, us, what made us who we are and whom we can become if we&#039;re fully committed to what we believe.

The only mistake from the studio is that there&#039;s no way this movie would appeals to a mass audience. The majority of people didn&#039;t even know about the novel to the day the marketing campaign started, curiosity brought them to see it, they expected a superhero action packed movie, instead they got a slow paced psychological thriller.

The box office numbers make sense to me.

I love the novel and the movie, I think Snyder did an amazing job, the story is so complex, people will always complain, the truth is, they&#039;re not complaining about the movie but the fact that it isn&#039;t the way they would&#039;ve wanted it to be  or imagined it would be, that&#039;s all.
I don&#039;t agree with everything in the movie but who cares, the essence is there.

Can&#039;t even be compared to V for Vendetta, cause this one is way more complex with the many characters development, etc...

These people became superheroes w/o powers except the one that counts the most, the mind/will and the belief you can change the world, to the point that Veidt perfected and marketed a method to reach that super human potential.
So if Batman can defeat Superman, well I believe in what they can do in this movie.

Do not forget to dream, be inspired and entertained, that&#039;s what this is about, not to analyze.

This is the birth of an instant &quot;underground&quot; cult classic;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Allyson.</p>
<p>They had no idea the novel would become such a hit, just happened to be, I believe its because it relates to the mind set and fears of that era, the approach was something new, with different kind of &#8220;super&#8221; heroes, us, what made us who we are and whom we can become if we&#8217;re fully committed to what we believe.</p>
<p>The only mistake from the studio is that there&#8217;s no way this movie would appeals to a mass audience. The majority of people didn&#8217;t even know about the novel to the day the marketing campaign started, curiosity brought them to see it, they expected a superhero action packed movie, instead they got a slow paced psychological thriller.</p>
<p>The box office numbers make sense to me.</p>
<p>I love the novel and the movie, I think Snyder did an amazing job, the story is so complex, people will always complain, the truth is, they&#8217;re not complaining about the movie but the fact that it isn&#8217;t the way they would&#8217;ve wanted it to be  or imagined it would be, that&#8217;s all.<br />
I don&#8217;t agree with everything in the movie but who cares, the essence is there.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t even be compared to V for Vendetta, cause this one is way more complex with the many characters development, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>These people became superheroes w/o powers except the one that counts the most, the mind/will and the belief you can change the world, to the point that Veidt perfected and marketed a method to reach that super human potential.<br />
So if Batman can defeat Superman, well I believe in what they can do in this movie.</p>
<p>Do not forget to dream, be inspired and entertained, that&#8217;s what this is about, not to analyze.</p>
<p>This is the birth of an instant &#8220;underground&#8221; cult classic;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105384</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105384</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good comparison, because I agree with you that V for Vendetta was a more successful movie. I suspect that&#039;s because they treated the comic as source material, not storyboards, and they considered what would need to be changed to both bring it up to date and make it work as a film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good comparison, because I agree with you that V for Vendetta was a more successful movie. I suspect that&#8217;s because they treated the comic as source material, not storyboards, and they considered what would need to be changed to both bring it up to date and make it work as a film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twmangrove</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105383</link>
		<dc:creator>twmangrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 04:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105383</guid>
		<description>Sorry, not a regular here but interested in comments on the director&#039;s cut, which I haven&#039;t been able to find anywhere and had hoped would be more in line with the book. 
As above, I had difficulties with some of the actors chosen, particularly for Ozy which was really quite poor. And, again as above, I thought JDM as the Commedian was the best of the lot - truly the one I wanted to see on screen the most as the character of the Commedian I&#039;ve long thought to be the most compelling. JDM was truly wonderful in the role. 
Visually the movie was slick in production, but in story retelling it just didn&#039;t quite succeed. Mind you, I think Moore is correct, that the book wasn&#039;t really intended for translation into film, at least not into the kind of film that is generally successful financially. And there&#039;s the rub. 
However, the same could be said for V, which I loved even more as a book. As a movie, I felt still had a political punch (more tailored to the Bush era than Thatcher) while offering appealing violence for the masses. And Hugo W. gave a most incredible performance for a man within an all concealing mask. It&#039;s one case where, IMO, Hollywood overcame the curse of Moore (not wanting anything to do with the film) and was able to do something pretty fine. The Watchmen, no so much but still, it could be (pending on the willingness of the viewer) more challenging than many other films of the genre (or in general).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, not a regular here but interested in comments on the director&#8217;s cut, which I haven&#8217;t been able to find anywhere and had hoped would be more in line with the book.<br />
As above, I had difficulties with some of the actors chosen, particularly for Ozy which was really quite poor. And, again as above, I thought JDM as the Commedian was the best of the lot &#8211; truly the one I wanted to see on screen the most as the character of the Commedian I&#8217;ve long thought to be the most compelling. JDM was truly wonderful in the role.<br />
Visually the movie was slick in production, but in story retelling it just didn&#8217;t quite succeed. Mind you, I think Moore is correct, that the book wasn&#8217;t really intended for translation into film, at least not into the kind of film that is generally successful financially. And there&#8217;s the rub.<br />
However, the same could be said for V, which I loved even more as a book. As a movie, I felt still had a political punch (more tailored to the Bush era than Thatcher) while offering appealing violence for the masses. And Hugo W. gave a most incredible performance for a man within an all concealing mask. It&#8217;s one case where, IMO, Hollywood overcame the curse of Moore (not wanting anything to do with the film) and was able to do something pretty fine. The Watchmen, no so much but still, it could be (pending on the willingness of the viewer) more challenging than many other films of the genre (or in general).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105344</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105344</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t particularly understand why there are such extreme opinions about this movie, to me, it just seems like a petty waste of time to continuoiusly argue about it. So I&#039;ll only do it once. I read half of the comic before I watched the movie, and I enjoyed both. I&#039;m the sort of person that enjoys differences in a book versus the movie adaptation of it. It just seems fun to think, &quot;Oh, it&#039;s almost like a parallel version of it.&quot; I loved the movie, and I loved the comic as well. The movie was very well put together, so much so, that I was astounded at the attention to little details and the accurateness of the shots. The only thing that dissapointed me only slightly was that, if you hadn&#039;t read the comic, you would have been lost, and not liked the movie at all. I can&#039;t come off saying, &quot;It&#039;s just another superhero movie,&quot; because it&#039;s not. They took it to higher levels, and did a great job. I think that the people who worked on the Watchmen movie should be praised for all their hard work. It&#039;s been said that &quot;Watchmen is unfilmable,&quot; and yet they did it. And I&#039;ll let you know, I bought both the comic, and the movie, because they are worth my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t particularly understand why there are such extreme opinions about this movie, to me, it just seems like a petty waste of time to continuoiusly argue about it. So I&#8217;ll only do it once. I read half of the comic before I watched the movie, and I enjoyed both. I&#8217;m the sort of person that enjoys differences in a book versus the movie adaptation of it. It just seems fun to think, &#8220;Oh, it&#8217;s almost like a parallel version of it.&#8221; I loved the movie, and I loved the comic as well. The movie was very well put together, so much so, that I was astounded at the attention to little details and the accurateness of the shots. The only thing that dissapointed me only slightly was that, if you hadn&#8217;t read the comic, you would have been lost, and not liked the movie at all. I can&#8217;t come off saying, &#8220;It&#8217;s just another superhero movie,&#8221; because it&#8217;s not. They took it to higher levels, and did a great job. I think that the people who worked on the Watchmen movie should be praised for all their hard work. It&#8217;s been said that &#8220;Watchmen is unfilmable,&#8221; and yet they did it. And I&#8217;ll let you know, I bought both the comic, and the movie, because they are worth my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105327</guid>
		<description>This movie for me was in the same category as not buying things by Harlan Ellison because he is a sexist jerk.

The screenwriter wrote this in order to get people to watch:
http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/031109-watchmen-movie-david-hayter-open-letter.php which includes the phrase &quot;Trust me. You&#039;ll come back, eventually. Just like Sally.&quot;

After that I decided there wasn&#039;t anything he could bring to the characters that I wanted to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie for me was in the same category as not buying things by Harlan Ellison because he is a sexist jerk.</p>
<p>The screenwriter wrote this in order to get people to watch:<br />
<a href="http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/031109-watchmen-movie-david-hayter-open-letter.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.watchmencomicmovie.com/031109-watchmen-movie-david-hayter-open-letter.php</a> which includes the phrase &#8220;Trust me. You&#8217;ll come back, eventually. Just like Sally.&#8221;</p>
<p>After that I decided there wasn&#8217;t anything he could bring to the characters that I wanted to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SignalNo.9</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105314</link>
		<dc:creator>SignalNo.9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105314</guid>
		<description>I read the Watchmen comic when I first heard about the movie. After seeing the movie I was  so completely disappointed that I will never watch the movie again. Moore himself was adamantly opposed to turning the comic into a film and now I see why. &#039;When he was approached by Terry Gilliam on how to film the comic book, Moore stated that he &quot;didn&#039;t think it was filmable&quot;. Moore clarified for Graydon, &quot;I didn&#039;t design it to show off the similarities between cinema and comics, which are there, but in my opinion are fairly unremarkable. It was designed to show off the things that comics could do that cinema and literature couldn&#039;t.&quot;[36]&#039; from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmen_(film)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the Watchmen comic when I first heard about the movie. After seeing the movie I was  so completely disappointed that I will never watch the movie again. Moore himself was adamantly opposed to turning the comic into a film and now I see why. &#8216;When he was approached by Terry Gilliam on how to film the comic book, Moore stated that he &#8220;didn&#8217;t think it was filmable&#8221;. Moore clarified for Graydon, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t design it to show off the similarities between cinema and comics, which are there, but in my opinion are fairly unremarkable. It was designed to show off the things that comics could do that cinema and literature couldn&#8217;t.&#8221;[36]&#8216; from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmen_(film)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchmen_(film)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fraser</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105278</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105278</guid>
		<description>You &#039; didn&#039;t particularly notice&#039;....riiight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You &#8216; didn&#8217;t particularly notice&#8217;&#8230;.riiight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105277</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105277</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t particularly notice the size either way. Maybe some people are just more focused on that? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t particularly notice the size either way. Maybe some people are just more focused on that? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Fraser</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2009/07/20/watchmen-directors-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-105276</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Fraser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=7824#comment-105276</guid>
		<description>Snyder was very faithful to Dave Gibbons, Alan Moore not so much.

In fact, it&#039;s all about Dr Manhattans Dick. In the book, Gibbons drew it as a demure little thing, that&#039;s how we knew that Ostermann/Manhattan just didn&#039;t care about being a human being anymore. Though he could have made it any size, shape or colour that he chose, these social pressures had ceased to be significant to him.

Zack Snyder had to have the big Dick.

I rest my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snyder was very faithful to Dave Gibbons, Alan Moore not so much.</p>
<p>In fact, it&#8217;s all about Dr Manhattans Dick. In the book, Gibbons drew it as a demure little thing, that&#8217;s how we knew that Ostermann/Manhattan just didn&#8217;t care about being a human being anymore. Though he could have made it any size, shape or colour that he chose, these social pressures had ceased to be significant to him.</p>
<p>Zack Snyder had to have the big Dick.</p>
<p>I rest my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

