<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax-Exempt Status in Danger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:47:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Went Wrong With Friends of Lulu? A Postmortem Interview &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-120534</link>
		<dc:creator>What Went Wrong With Friends of Lulu? A Postmortem Interview &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-120534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] again &#8212; given history, I will not be able to follow up with Valerie Gallaher to ask about the status of the records, but [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] again &#8212; given history, I will not be able to follow up with Valerie Gallaher to ask about the status of the records, but [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comics A.M. &#124; The comics Internet in two minutes &#124; Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources &#8211; Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-114654</link>
		<dc:creator>Comics A.M. &#124; The comics Internet in two minutes &#124; Robot 6 @ Comic Book Resources &#8211; Covering Comic Book News and Entertainment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-114654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has announced that as of Jan. 1 she&#8217;ll no longer be president of Friends of Lulu, the troubled comics-advocacy group that&#8217;s in danger of losing its tax-exempt status. She was elected [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] has announced that as of Jan. 1 she&#8217;ll no longer be president of Friends of Lulu, the troubled comics-advocacy group that&#8217;s in danger of losing its tax-exempt status. She was elected [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Have a Vision for Women in Comics? Friends of Lulu Needs Help &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-113327</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Have a Vision for Women in Comics? Friends of Lulu Needs Help &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-113327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] president Valerie D&#8217;Orazio (who took the role in October 2007 and has held it ever since) attacked me for asking a question about the organization. (To be fair, I&#8217;ve been tough on her before, so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] president Valerie D&#8217;Orazio (who took the role in October 2007 and has held it ever since) attacked me for asking a question about the organization. (To be fair, I&#8217;ve been tough on her before, so [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comic Charity Tax Exemption Followup &#187; Comics Worth Reading</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111508</link>
		<dc:creator>Comic Charity Tax Exemption Followup &#187; Comics Worth Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] rules changed in 2006, so according to the New York Times, some organizations were in danger of losing their tax-exempt status.) Both the CBLDF and the Hero Initiative have now confirmed that they have no [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] rules changed in 2006, so according to the New York Times, some organizations were in danger of losing their tax-exempt status.) Both the CBLDF and the Hero Initiative have now confirmed that they have no [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAC</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111070</link>
		<dc:creator>RAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t the first time D&#039;Orazio has done exactly this: pick a fight against someone for saying things she didn&#039;t like, talk about it on her blog, and then lock/delete the comments when they weren&#039;t going her way. 

About the time that I noticed that the only things that each of these instances had in common was &lt;i&gt;Valerie D&#039;Orazio&lt;/i&gt; is when I stopped reading her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t the first time D&#8217;Orazio has done exactly this: pick a fight against someone for saying things she didn&#8217;t like, talk about it on her blog, and then lock/delete the comments when they weren&#8217;t going her way. </p>
<p>About the time that I noticed that the only things that each of these instances had in common was <i>Valerie D&#8217;Orazio</i> is when I stopped reading her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Scarborough</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Scarborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I note that D’Orazio has now deleted the comments to that post, which were largely negative but polite, as I recall. Between that and not linking to this post, she seems awfully thin-skinned and petty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that D’Orazio has now deleted the comments to that post, which were largely negative but polite, as I recall. Between that and not linking to this post, she seems awfully thin-skinned and petty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Bryan</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111063</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that link, Ragnell!  I DID look because I have the energy and the curiosity, and he appears to have deleted that article and the other one linked in that post.  Kind of a shame, really.  I was looking forward to rereading it and experiencing again his unique vibe of fear and hatred, plus the need for validation from attention.  Any kind of attention at all.  

You don&#039;t often see that kind of craziness distilled into its purest form.  It made me nostalgic for those heady days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that link, Ragnell!  I DID look because I have the energy and the curiosity, and he appears to have deleted that article and the other one linked in that post.  Kind of a shame, really.  I was looking forward to rereading it and experiencing again his unique vibe of fear and hatred, plus the need for validation from attention.  Any kind of attention at all.  </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t often see that kind of craziness distilled into its purest form.  It made me nostalgic for those heady days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolkin</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111062</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(I was totally kidding before. I am not that troll.)

I&#039;m just sad to see so much anger flying around my favorite little world in the whole wide world, you know?

I always hope that when people are gonna fight comics, they&#039;re gonna be fighting about comics, instead of hating on each other. But every world has its politics and its conflicts, whether you like it or not. 

Whoever it was that said that Johanna is acting like a thoughtful, mature adult in this, whether she&#039;s right or wrong, I agree with that. You put your anger and bitterness aside when you&#039;re representing an organization, if you want to do so responsibly, unless that type of behavior would somehow actually be in service to your mission, which in this case is obviously not true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I was totally kidding before. I am not that troll.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just sad to see so much anger flying around my favorite little world in the whole wide world, you know?</p>
<p>I always hope that when people are gonna fight comics, they&#8217;re gonna be fighting about comics, instead of hating on each other. But every world has its politics and its conflicts, whether you like it or not. </p>
<p>Whoever it was that said that Johanna is acting like a thoughtful, mature adult in this, whether she&#8217;s right or wrong, I agree with that. You put your anger and bitterness aside when you&#8217;re representing an organization, if you want to do so responsibly, unless that type of behavior would somehow actually be in service to your mission, which in this case is obviously not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragnell</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111060</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laroquod -- The title sounds familiar to me, to the point I&#039;d suspect I wrote it.  (Nothing on my site by that title, though).

I&#039;ve dug up an old reference to a &quot;Gail Simone Hates Women&quot; post written by one of our old misogynistic trolls.   Ah, the fond memories of that guy and his constant attempts for attention.  Maybe that&#039;s where we&#039;re thinking of it from.

http://womenincomics.blogspot.com/2007/11/november-28th-2007.html 

Please note, this guy was such an attention-starved asshole I&#039;m not linking him directly, or even checking to see if his blog&#039;s still there.  I don&#039;t have the energy.  But the post did exist, and it was about Simone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laroquod &#8212; The title sounds familiar to me, to the point I&#8217;d suspect I wrote it.  (Nothing on my site by that title, though).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve dug up an old reference to a &#8220;Gail Simone Hates Women&#8221; post written by one of our old misogynistic trolls.   Ah, the fond memories of that guy and his constant attempts for attention.  Maybe that&#8217;s where we&#8217;re thinking of it from.</p>
<p><a href="http://womenincomics.blogspot.com/2007/11/november-28th-2007.html" rel="nofollow">http://womenincomics.blogspot.com/2007/11/november-28th-2007.html</a> </p>
<p>Please note, this guy was such an attention-starved asshole I&#8217;m not linking him directly, or even checking to see if his blog&#8217;s still there.  I don&#8217;t have the energy.  But the post did exist, and it was about Simone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laroquod</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111059</link>
		<dc:creator>Laroquod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Johanna. I believe you. I just wanted to clear that up.

I don&#039;t know what the real story is with this accusation but I don&#039;t think Valerie made up that article title &#039;Valerie D&#039;Orazio Hates Women&#039;; I&#039;m pretty sure I have seen that title sometime in the last year in my RSS. Doubt I read it because I don&#039;t recall any details and besides, it&#039;s not a topic that shouts to me, &#039;This is consequential and you must read it.&#039; But it&#039;s an unusual title so it stuck in my mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Johanna. I believe you. I just wanted to clear that up.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the real story is with this accusation but I don&#8217;t think Valerie made up that article title &#8216;Valerie D&#8217;Orazio Hates Women&#8217;; I&#8217;m pretty sure I have seen that title sometime in the last year in my RSS. Doubt I read it because I don&#8217;t recall any details and besides, it&#8217;s not a topic that shouts to me, &#8216;This is consequential and you must read it.&#8217; But it&#8217;s an unusual title so it stuck in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111058</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I&#039;m sorry, I thought that was clear from Jamie and I talking about how the article didn&#039;t exist. I never wrote such an article or headline. I tried to find anything by that title in Google, and the only thing that shows up is her reference to it. So I have no idea what she was thinking of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sorry, I thought that was clear from Jamie and I talking about how the article didn&#8217;t exist. I never wrote such an article or headline. I tried to find anything by that title in Google, and the only thing that shows up is her reference to it. So I have no idea what she was thinking of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laroquod</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111050</link>
		<dc:creator>Laroquod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 03:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether Valerie is right or wrong, she has acted horribly. Being right is not an excuse for acting horribly.

Whether or not Johanna is right or wrong, she has comported herself reasonably well and without rancour or vindictiveness. Anyone can be wrong; it isn&#039;t a moral failing.

It seems obvious to me on which side of this issue the right lies (having read as many background articles on both blogs as I can find), and if it isn&#039;t with Johanna, then I must say Valerie has done just a terrible job representing herself, both in her email response and on her blog. She compares Johanna to Mrs. Kravitz but doesn&#039;t bother to point out any resemblances between the two; it is just supposed to be so because it is so. Because it&#039;s funny, I guess. Maybe Johanna *is* like Mrs. Kravitz; I would be curious to find out why, but Valerie doesn&#039;t think I need to know — big mistake. And I find the same lack of rigour flows throughout her defence. Maybe she is a good writer, but in this she has failed.

The only thing that gives me pause is Johanna&#039;s failure to address the &#039;Valeria D&#039;Orazio Hates Women&#039; article (re: being accused of writing same). She was asked about it above and her answer seemed like a dodge. So I&#039;d like to ask it again. Johanna did you write that article, and if so what happened to it? Why isn&#039;t it online anymore? And if you didn&#039;t write that article then who did? I do have some recollection of seeing an article with that title in my RSS feeds at one point, though I don&#039;t think I read it and have no idea where it came from.

Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Valerie is right or wrong, she has acted horribly. Being right is not an excuse for acting horribly.</p>
<p>Whether or not Johanna is right or wrong, she has comported herself reasonably well and without rancour or vindictiveness. Anyone can be wrong; it isn&#8217;t a moral failing.</p>
<p>It seems obvious to me on which side of this issue the right lies (having read as many background articles on both blogs as I can find), and if it isn&#8217;t with Johanna, then I must say Valerie has done just a terrible job representing herself, both in her email response and on her blog. She compares Johanna to Mrs. Kravitz but doesn&#8217;t bother to point out any resemblances between the two; it is just supposed to be so because it is so. Because it&#8217;s funny, I guess. Maybe Johanna *is* like Mrs. Kravitz; I would be curious to find out why, but Valerie doesn&#8217;t think I need to know — big mistake. And I find the same lack of rigour flows throughout her defence. Maybe she is a good writer, but in this she has failed.</p>
<p>The only thing that gives me pause is Johanna&#8217;s failure to address the &#8216;Valeria D&#8217;Orazio Hates Women&#8217; article (re: being accused of writing same). She was asked about it above and her answer seemed like a dodge. So I&#8217;d like to ask it again. Johanna did you write that article, and if so what happened to it? Why isn&#8217;t it online anymore? And if you didn&#8217;t write that article then who did? I do have some recollection of seeing an article with that title in my RSS feeds at one point, though I don&#8217;t think I read it and have no idea where it came from.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111045</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ray for the win! You are a role model for us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray for the win! You are a role model for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like Rich Johnston. Sue me. 

Then again, I like most people. I even like Val, to be honest. I thought her memoir was an incredible read, and I envy the fact that she&#039;s been able to break into Marvel at a time when that&#039;s a very hard thing to do.

I don&#039;t even mind the fact that, after Tweeting about this, her boyfriend tried to save the day, all white knight-ish, on my Twitter feed. His heart&#039;s in the right place, although I still got no answer on the tax-exempt thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Rich Johnston. Sue me. </p>
<p>Then again, I like most people. I even like Val, to be honest. I thought her memoir was an incredible read, and I envy the fact that she&#8217;s been able to break into Marvel at a time when that&#8217;s a very hard thing to do.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even mind the fact that, after Tweeting about this, her boyfriend tried to save the day, all white knight-ish, on my Twitter feed. His heart&#8217;s in the right place, although I still got no answer on the tax-exempt thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Johnston</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111043</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg, I&#039;ve always been me. No one else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I&#8217;ve always been me. No one else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg G</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111036</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God, Rich Johnston really is a parody of himself these days. Not that what he was ever anything to be proud of.

A response to a request for comment is not a private email.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, Rich Johnston really is a parody of himself these days. Not that what he was ever anything to be proud of.</p>
<p>A response to a request for comment is not a private email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolkin</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111033</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let us not forget one very important truth amidst all of this conflict:

Gail Simone hates women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us not forget one very important truth amidst all of this conflict:</p>
<p>Gail Simone hates women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111028</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the laugh, Thom! No BR player, not yet. :) I&#039;ve been hypocritical plenty of times in my life, tho -- it&#039;s part of the human condition. I do try not to be mean, as much as I can avoid it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the laugh, Thom! No BR player, not yet. :) I&#8217;ve been hypocritical plenty of times in my life, tho &#8212; it&#8217;s part of the human condition. I do try not to be mean, as much as I can avoid it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111025</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am perplexed at that response.  I have never found myself feeling you were mean or bitter, even when we disagree on a topic.  I haven&#039;t found you hypocritical either...unless, secretly you own a blu-ray playe and watch blu-rays all the time.  But that would be more lying than hypocrisy.  ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am perplexed at that response.  I have never found myself feeling you were mean or bitter, even when we disagree on a topic.  I haven&#8217;t found you hypocritical either&#8230;unless, secretly you own a blu-ray playe and watch blu-rays all the time.  But that would be more lying than hypocrisy.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/04/25/tax-exempt-status-in-danger/comment-page-1/#comment-111023</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=11944#comment-111023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the outside world of journalism and newspapers, this is actually how people piss off reporters and editors and pretty much make their own beds when it comes to coverage. Part of getting information out there involves being professional with people you don&#039;t personally like - and even if the private response is emotional, putting it on a blog is really out of line. This just isn&#039;t how professional people act.

Which isn&#039;t aimed at you, Johanna - if I were in your position, I probably wouldn&#039;t even have addressed it on the blog at all, fearing that I was playing into the person&#039;s hands, but that&#039;s just me. For the most part you  have conducted yourself in a very professional manner in this situation in which someone made a fairly cut and dry news story into a personal issue that it didn&#039;t have to be. Congrats to you for taking the high road.

Keep up the great work!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the outside world of journalism and newspapers, this is actually how people piss off reporters and editors and pretty much make their own beds when it comes to coverage. Part of getting information out there involves being professional with people you don&#8217;t personally like &#8211; and even if the private response is emotional, putting it on a blog is really out of line. This just isn&#8217;t how professional people act.</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t aimed at you, Johanna &#8211; if I were in your position, I probably wouldn&#8217;t even have addressed it on the blog at all, fearing that I was playing into the person&#8217;s hands, but that&#8217;s just me. For the most part you  have conducted yourself in a very professional manner in this situation in which someone made a fairly cut and dry news story into a personal issue that it didn&#8217;t have to be. Congrats to you for taking the high road.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
