<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newest Disney Diamond Edition Is Bambi, Due March 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:22:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bambi II &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-121431</link>
		<dc:creator>Bambi II &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 11:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=16508#comment-121431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] over an hour without credits) direct-to-video sequel to the wildlife classic, released itself on Blu-ray earlier this year. Instead of focusing on the realism of the animal images, though, which was the strength of Bambi [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] over an hour without credits) direct-to-video sequel to the wildlife classic, released itself on Blu-ray earlier this year. Instead of focusing on the realism of the animal images, though, which was the strength of Bambi [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tron: Legacy &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-118967</link>
		<dc:creator>Tron: Legacy &#187; DVDs Worth Watching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=16508#comment-118967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] is the second movie (after Bambi) with Disney Second Screen, a way to have your laptop or iPad follow along with the movie and show [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em; background-color: #FEF1B5;">
<p>[...] is the second movie (after Bambi) with Disney Second Screen, a way to have your laptop or iPad follow along with the movie and show [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-116637</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=16508#comment-116637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disney said in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ultimatedisney.com/diamondcollection-pressrelease-0910.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;original press release&lt;/a&gt; that the Diamonds would be 14 of the &quot;most historic and beloved animated classics&quot;. Of course, that&#039;s when they planned to include the two Fantasia titles, so I don&#039;t know if they&#039;ve changed the count. Sleeping Beauty and Pinocchio are both on the list, perhaps in another few years once they&#039;ve sold out of the Platinums?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney said in the <a href="http://www.ultimatedisney.com/diamondcollection-pressrelease-0910.html" rel="nofollow">original press release</a> that the Diamonds would be 14 of the &#8220;most historic and beloved animated classics&#8221;. Of course, that&#8217;s when they planned to include the two Fantasia titles, so I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;ve changed the count. Sleeping Beauty and Pinocchio are both on the list, perhaps in another few years once they&#8217;ve sold out of the Platinums?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-116636</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=16508#comment-116636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, I was giong to say I thought there were more Diamond editions...but both Sleeping Beauty and Pinnochio were Platinum Editions...and the upcoming Alice In Wonderland isn&#039;t even a Platinum Edition.  How does Disney decide these?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I was giong to say I thought there were more Diamond editions&#8230;but both Sleeping Beauty and Pinnochio were Platinum Editions&#8230;and the upcoming Alice In Wonderland isn&#8217;t even a Platinum Edition.  How does Disney decide these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augie De Blieck Jr.</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2010/12/10/newest-disney-diamond-edition-is-bambi-due-march-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-116593</link>
		<dc:creator>Augie De Blieck Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=16508#comment-116593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really?  The deleted song is “Twitterpated”? Ya think Disney will sponsor a hashtag when the Blu-ray is released?  Or this just the first step to suing Twitter for trademark infringement?  (&quot;Yeah, we had &quot;Twitter 60 years ago.  Pay up!&quot;)

The second question is a joke.  I think.  Ya just never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?  The deleted song is “Twitterpated”? Ya think Disney will sponsor a hashtag when the Blu-ray is released?  Or this just the first step to suing Twitter for trademark infringement?  (&#8220;Yeah, we had &#8220;Twitter 60 years ago.  Pay up!&#8221;)</p>
<p>The second question is a joke.  I think.  Ya just never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
