<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Peanuts the Best Comic Ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/</link>
	<description>Independent Opinions on Comics of All Kinds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johanna</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-121148</link>
		<dc:creator>Johanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=21055#comment-121148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much, Robert. I&#039;ve corrected the piece regarding Kirby. I don&#039;t know WHAT I was thinking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much, Robert. I&#8217;ve corrected the piece regarding Kirby. I don&#8217;t know WHAT I was thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stanley Martin</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-121147</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stanley Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=21055#comment-121147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thad--

Gilbert and Jaime don&#039;t collaborate on their material. That&#039;s why their work was tallied separately. 

And we didn&#039;t treat MAD as a collective work. The ranking is for &lt;em&gt;Harvey Kurtzman&#039;s&lt;/em&gt; MAD. His collaborators were all clearly his subordinates on the material. There weren&#039;t any other MAD entries in the Top 115, but two that just missed out were Mort Drucker&#039;s work for the magazine, as well as Sergio Aragonés&#039;.

Grant--

The HU rankings do not reflect any value judgment on the part of me or Noah Berlatsky beyond the top-10 lists we submitted, which were of course offset by the other 209 lists we received. The rankings are entirely based on the number of votes received. And if you think the consensus list is predictable, I suggest you look at the entire Top 115. I think you&#039;ll be pretty startled. You&#039;ll be even more startled by the 211 individual contributor lists, which HU started publishing this week.

Johanna-

Quick correction: Kirby did make the top 10. The Fantastic Four was #10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thad&#8211;</p>
<p>Gilbert and Jaime don&#8217;t collaborate on their material. That&#8217;s why their work was tallied separately. </p>
<p>And we didn&#8217;t treat MAD as a collective work. The ranking is for <em>Harvey Kurtzman&#8217;s</em> MAD. His collaborators were all clearly his subordinates on the material. There weren&#8217;t any other MAD entries in the Top 115, but two that just missed out were Mort Drucker&#8217;s work for the magazine, as well as Sergio Aragonés&#8217;.</p>
<p>Grant&#8211;</p>
<p>The HU rankings do not reflect any value judgment on the part of me or Noah Berlatsky beyond the top-10 lists we submitted, which were of course offset by the other 209 lists we received. The rankings are entirely based on the number of votes received. And if you think the consensus list is predictable, I suggest you look at the entire Top 115. I think you&#8217;ll be pretty startled. You&#8217;ll be even more startled by the 211 individual contributor lists, which HU started publishing this week.</p>
<p>Johanna-</p>
<p>Quick correction: Kirby did make the top 10. The Fantastic Four was #10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-121131</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=21055#comment-121131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not surprised at Kirbys ranking given that Berlatsky did a rather lengthy article about how Kirby is over rated and how when it comes to Kirby&#039;s popularity he &quot;doesn&#039;t get it&quot;.  Frankly, I&#039;m surprised Charles Shultz isn&#039;t called a hack by HU.  

This list seems pretty safe and predictable but I still don&#039;t take HU seriously.  Basically troll comments dressed up as legitimate criticism by contributors who think they&#039;re at the algonquin round table.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised at Kirbys ranking given that Berlatsky did a rather lengthy article about how Kirby is over rated and how when it comes to Kirby&#8217;s popularity he &#8220;doesn&#8217;t get it&#8221;.  Frankly, I&#8217;m surprised Charles Shultz isn&#8217;t called a hack by HU.  </p>
<p>This list seems pretty safe and predictable but I still don&#8217;t take HU seriously.  Basically troll comments dressed up as legitimate criticism by contributors who think they&#8217;re at the algonquin round table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://comicsworthreading.com/2011/08/05/is-peanuts-the-best-comic-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-121115</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comicsworthreading.com/?p=21055#comment-121115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also seems kind of arbitrary that Mad is taken as a collective work while Love and Rockets isn&#039;t.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also seems kind of arbitrary that Mad is taken as a collective work while Love and Rockets isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
