Cheshire Crossing

Cheshire Crossing

Coming in July is a graphic novel that sounds quite promising but turns out to be terrible.

The writer of The Martian, Andy Weir, has unearthed Cheshire Crossing. This early project, originally a webcomic, has Alice, Dorothy, and Wendy (from Alice in Wonderland, The Wizard of Oz, and Peter Pan, respectively) put in an asylum together where they escape for battles with each other’s traditional enemies. Since he explains in the introduction that he can’t draw, the publisher, Ten Speed Press, has had Sarah Andersen (Sarah’s Scribbles) illustrate it.

Cheshire Crossing

The authors’ previous works give you a good idea what to expect. Weir spends more time on explaining how various magic spells work than developing any of the characters. The girls all sound alike (and, in a book aimed at 8-12 year olds, curse a surprising amount). Andersen’s designs are cute, but the action scenes are flat, lacking suspense or a good movement flow.

Weir turns girls’ fantasy journeys into a boys’ adventure tale, with battle after battle and little of substance happening between them. I kept losing track of where they were and what they were trying to achieve. The one piece of characterization that will stick with me (not in a good way) is Peter Pan being aged up enough to be horny, constantly talking about wanting to touch Alice. I think their nanny is supposed to be Mary Poppins, but she’s not named (since the character is still protected intellectual property).

I hope customers, particularly librarians, don’t buy this for kids. It’s inappropriate, with unsuitably adult topics (what with all the violence and sex jokes), thoroughly unpleasant, and overall, a muddled mess.



2 comments

  • Eric G

    I remember enjoying this in the original webcomic version; but it’s been years since I’ve read it. The nanny was explicitly Mary Poppins in the original, if I recall.

    I know I came to the webcomic version from Casey & Andy, (Weir’s earlier webcomic) so I wasn’t expecting something kid-appropriate. As you say, the concept is enormously promising; and I definitely found Weir’s take more pleasant (which is not the same as better, necessarily) than LOST GIRLS. (A work I can respect on a craft level but can’t stand.) Weir said back then that he had not heard of Lost Girls when he started the project.

    I was looking forward to this, but after your review I’m much more skeptical. I wonder if I can track down the original anywhere and see how I feel about it now. It’s entirely possible I was enjoying the idea a lot more than the execution back when I first saw it.

  • Lost Girls hasn’t aged very well, has it? A lot of what set me off about Cheshire Crossing was that the publisher is promoting this for kids, which is a terrible idea. If you wanted to aim at young men, that would be a different story (and make a lot of this more understandable). Thanks for sharing your memories of the original.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *